Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542838›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020

Perioperative monitoring of inguinal hernia patients with a smartphone application.

L van Hout, W J V Bökkerink, M S Ibelings, P W H E Vriens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical feasibility of the Q1.6 Inguinal Hernia application: a prospective cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L van HoutDepartment of Surgery, Hernia Centre Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands. l.vanhout@etz.nl.
W J V BökkerinkDepartment of Surgery, Hernia Centre Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
M S IbelingsDepartment of Surgery, Hernia Centre Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
P W H E VriensDepartment of Surgery, Hernia Centre Brabant, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital (ETZ), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient Reported Outcomes have become standard in the evaluation of inguinal hernia repair. However, the chosen outcomes remain heterogeneous and the measurements time-consuming or inadequate. Perioperative measurement of pain and recovery could benefit from the contemporary possibilities that mobile health applications offer.

methodsAn application for smartphones and tablets was developed using the twitch crowdsourcing concept, classical questionnaires, experiences from randomised clinical trials, and patients' input.

resultsDichotomous questions and numeric rating scales, both pre- and post-operative, were implemented in the freely available Q1.6 application. Content, timing and frequencies were adapted to the inguinal hernia patient's daily life and assumed recovery. Certain combinations of answers were set as alert notifications to detect adverse events. Data are displayed on a web-based dashboard enabling real-time monitoring. Legal aspects were examined and taken into account. DISCUSSION: The Q1.6 inguinal hernia app is an innovative tool for perioperative monitoring of pain and recovery of inguinal hernia patients. Previous limitations of classical measurements such as a large heterogeneity, retrospective data recording and different forms of bias can be eliminated. The `big data´ generated in this manner might be used for large-scale research to improve inguinal hernia surgery. The Q1.6 platform is not only hernia specific; it is also an innovative tool to measure PROs in any other domain.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyMobile ApplicationsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSmartphoneCrowdsourcingFemaleGroinHernia, InguinalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBig dataInguinal herniam-HealthPatient monitoringSmartphone application

Identifiers

PMID31542838
OpenAlexW2974234286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.