Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542802›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Brain functional differences in visuo-motor task adaptation between dominant and non-dominant hand training.

Krystal M Kirby, Sreekrishna Ramakrishna Pillai, Owen T Carmichael, Arend W A Van Gemmert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. No Motor Costs of Physical Education with Eduball.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Physical Education with Eduball Stimulates Non-Native Language Learning in Primary School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Laterality in Children: Evidence for Task-Dependent Lateralization of Motor Functions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krystal M KirbyFine Motor Control and Learning Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. kkirb11@lsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9379-7105
Sreekrishna Ramakrishna PillaiBiomedical Imaging Center, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
Owen T CarmichaelBiomedical Imaging Center, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-0047
Arend W A Van GemmertFine Motor Control and Learning Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-1409

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although learning and adapting to visuo-motor tasks is critical to child development and health conditions requiring rehabilitation, the neural processes involved in learning a new visuo-motor task and adapting it to novel conditions such as execution with an untrained limb are not fully understood. Therefore, we trained 27 healthy, right-hand-dominant individuals aged 18-35 years to perform a multidirectional point-to-point visually rotated aiming task with a joystick during functional magnetic resonance imaging, with 13 participants learning the task with the dominant (D) and 14 with the non-dominant (ND) hand. All individuals performed the task with the trained and untrained hand before and after training. As expected, performance of both the trained and the untrained hand improved significantly over the course of task acquisition. Brain functional changes associated with adaptation to the demands of the task, and execution differed significantly between D and ND groups. In particular, the ND group showed greater recruitment of visual and motor regions (left middle occipital and left precentral gyri) than the D group during task acquisition. In addition, the D group exhibited greater recruitment of motor planning regions (left precuneus) that contribute to performance with the trained hand, even after bilateral transfer-switching from the trained to non-trained hand. The D group showed more persistence of activation in sensorimotor regions-greater activation when returning to the rotated task after a switching to a simpler, non-rotated aiming task for a short interval. Finally, the D group showed more activation after-effects-increases in simpler task activation after training on the visually rotated task. The findings suggest that brain functional changes associated with adaptation to a visuo-motor skill may differ substantially depending on whether the dominant or non-dominant hand is trained, with non-dominant-hand training associated with greater activation during acquisition, and dominant-hand training associated with greater activation during bilateral transfer, persistence, and after-effects.

Indexed as

Brain MappingPractice, PsychologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexFunctional LateralityHandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionTransfer, PsychologyVisual PerceptionYoung AdultBilateral transferFunctional MRIHandednessMotor acquisitionMotor learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.