Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542787›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Elevated Cardiac Troponin in Clinical Scenarios Beyond Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Michael Sternberg, Evasio Pasini, Carol Chen-Scarabelli, Giovannii Corsetti, Hemang Patel, Daniele Linardi, Francesco Onorati, Giuseppe Faggian, Tiziano Scarabelli, Louis Saravolatz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. African Vegetables (Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael SternbergDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Evasio PasiniScientific Clinical Institutes Maugeri, Cardiac Rehabilitation Lumezzane Institute, Brescia, Italy.
Carol Chen-ScarabelliCenter for Heart and Vessel Preclinical Studies, Department of Internal Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Giovannii CorsettiDivision of Human Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Hemang PatelGeneral Medical Education, Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Daniele LinardiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Francesco OnoratiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe FaggianDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Tiziano ScarabelliCenter for Heart and Vessel Preclinical Studies, Department of Internal Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Louis SaravolatzDepartment of Medicine, Ascension St. John Hospital and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this systematic review article, we aim to summarize the most up-to-date evidence regarding elevations of cardiac troponin, especially in clinical scenarios other than obstructive coronary artery disease. The accurate interpretation of raised cardiac troponin is challenging because it relies on unconfirmed postulations and dogmatic knowledge (e.g., the exclusive provenience of cardiac troponin from cardiac myocytes), based on which every troponin elevation is assumed to definitely indicate myocardial damage. Indeed, the investigation of the pathophysiologic mechanism leading to the release in the bloodstream of cardiac biomarkers should be the first step of the diagnostic process to fully understand the clinical significance of the elevated serum levels and identify the best management. A prominent effort should be put in place to identify the contribution of potential confounding factors, both cardiac and non-cardiac in etiology, with the ability to affect synthesis and clearance of cardiac biomarkers. Regardless of the underlying cause, it is well established that cardiovascular biomarkers are increasingly useful to further risk stratification and prognosticate patients. Accordingly, we sought to clarify the meaning and impact of elevated cardiac troponin in those frequently encountered real-world scenarios presenting clinicians with a diagnostic dilemma, with the final goal of facilitating the diagnosis and help optimize individually tailored treatment strategies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansModels, BiologicalMyocardiumTroponinBiomarkersTroponin

Identifiers

PMID31542787
PMCPMC6774266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.