Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542778›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Flavour types used by youth and adult tobacco users in wave 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study 2014-2015.

Shyanika W Rose, Amanda L Johnson, Allison M Glasser, Andrea C Villanti, Bridget K Ambrose, Kevin Conway, K Michael Cummings, Cassandra A Stanton, Cristine Delnevo, Olivia A Wackowski and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Willingness to Use Commercial Nicotine Gums, Lozenges, and Gummies Among Nontobacco Using Adolescents in Southern California.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Relative Reinforcing Value of Menthol Among Young Adult Cigarette Smokers: Results From a Behavioral Choice Task.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Neighborhood Inequities in Tobacco Product Descriptors, Washington, DC, 2018-2019.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inequitable Distribution of FTP Marketing by Neighborhood Characteristics: Further Evidence for Targeted Marketing.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Shyanika W RoseTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC, USA s.rose@uky.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-1197
Amanda L JohnsonOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Allison M GlasserTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrea C VillantiTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Bridget K AmbroseOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Kevin ConwayDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
K Michael CummingsPsychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-7017
Cassandra A StantonWestat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Cristine DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Olivia A WackowskiCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Kathryn C EdwardsWestat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Shari P FeirmanOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Maansi Bansal-TraversHealth Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Jennifer BernatOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Enver Holder-HayesOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Victoria GreenDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Marushka L SilveiraDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4880-2550
Yitong ZhouTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Haneen AbudayyehTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrew HylandHealth Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost youth and young adult (YA) tobacco users use flavoured products; however, little is known about specific flavours used.

methodsWe report flavour types among US tobacco users from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, wave 2, 2014-2015. At wave 2, we examined (1) flavour use and type at past 30-day use; (2) new flavoured tobacco product use and type; (3) product-specific flavour patterns across youth (ages 12-17) (n=920), YA (18-24) (n=3726) and adult (25+) (n=10 346) past 30-day and new tobacco users and (4) concordance between self-coded and expert-coded brand flavour type among all adults (18+).

resultsPrevalence of flavoured tobacco product use was highest among youth, followed by YA and adult 25+ any tobacco users. Within each age group, flavoured use was greatest among hookah, e-cigarette and snus users. Overall, menthol/mint, fruit and candy/sweet were the most prevalent flavour types at first and past 30-day use across age groups. For past 30-day use, all flavour types except menthol/mint exhibited an inverse age gradient, with more prevalent use among youth and YAs, followed by adults 25+. Prevalence of menthol/mint use was high (over 50% youth, YAs; 76% adults 25+) and exhibited a positive age gradient overall, though the reverse for cigarettes. Brand-categorised and self-reported flavour use measures among adults 18+ were moderately to substantially concordant across most products.

conclusionsCommon flavours like menthol/mint, fruit and candy/sweet enhance appeal to young tobacco users. Information on flavour types used by product and age can inform tobacco flavour regulations to addess flavour appeal especially among youth.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsHealth StatusPopulation SurveillanceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesFlavoring Agentsnon-cigarette tobacco productspackaging and labellingpublic policysurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID31542778
PMCPMC7462091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.