Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542750›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Population-based cross-sectional study of 11 645 Spanish nonagenarians with type 2 diabetes mellitus: cardiovascular profile, cardiovascular preventive therapies, achievement goals and sex differences.

Miguel Angel Salinero-Fort, Jose M Mostaza-Prieto, Carlos Lahoz-Rallo, José Ignacio Vicente Díez, Juan Cárdenas-Valladolid

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: A Systematic Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2021
    Review
  5. Diabetes, Albuminuria and the Kidney-Brain Axis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Angel Salinero-FortSubdirección General de Investigación Sanitaria, Consejería de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain miguel.salinero@salud.madrid.org.
Jose M Mostaza-PrietoMedicina Interna, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Lahoz-RalloMedicina Interna, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José Ignacio Vicente DíezCentro de Salud Monovar, Comunidad de Madrid Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Cárdenas-ValladolidFundación de Investigación e Innovación Biosanitaria de Atención Primaria, Madrid, Spain.
Bioef - Fundación Vasca de Innovación e Investigación Sanitarias · ESComunidad de Madrid · ESMadrid Health Service · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the risk profile, achievement of cardiometabolic goals, and frequency and optimal use of cardiovascular preventive therapies among nonagenarians with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To investigate possible sex differences. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional population study of 11 645 persons aged ≥90 years with T2DM living in Madrid (Spain). Sociodemographic, clinical and therapy profiles were collected through electronic records in primary care. We considered antihypertensive therapy and lipid-lowering therapy to be optimal when known patients with hypertension with albuminuria received renin-angiotensin system blockers and statins had been prescribed for overt cardiovascular disease.

resultsThe prevalence of coronary artery disease was higher in males than in females (21.5% vs 12.6%, p<0.01), as was that of peripheral artery disease (8.5% vs 2.3%, p<0.01). However, the prevalence of cerebrovascular disease was similar in both sexes (16.5% vs 16%; p=0.44). Haemoglobin A1c was lower than 7% in 64.4% of cases, with female predominance in patients with known dementia (67.1% female vs 59.9% male; p<0.01). Antiplatelet therapy was significantly more frequent in males than in females (48.1% vs 44.3%; p<0.01), as were statins (43.2% vs 40.2%; p<0.01). Both in primary and in secondary prevention, rates for simultaneous achievement of the HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL-C goals were significantly lower among females (p<0.01). For each criterion of optimal use of cardiovascular preventive therapies, adherence was significantly better in males than in females.

conclusionOur study showed that the risk of cerebrovascular disease was similar in both male and female Spanish nonagenarians. Adherence was poorer in females for all criteria of optimal use of cardiovascular preventive therapies. Our findings indicate that the known sex differences in younger patients with T2DM persist in patients aged ≥90 years. There is considerable room for improvement in standards of preventive care in nonagenarians with T2DM, especially in females.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGoalsHumansMaleRisk AssessmentSex DistributionSex Factorsaged 80 and overcardiovascular preventive therapiescerebrovascular diseaseperipheral artery diseasetype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31542750
PMCPMC6756452
OpenAlexW2974059793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.