Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542734›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Effectiveness and safety of oral Chinese patent medicines as adjuvant treatment for unstable angina pectoris on the national essential drugs list of China: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Zhen Hua, Feng-Ting Zhai, Jinhui Tian, Cheng-Fei Gao, Peng Xu, Fan Zhang, Si-Jia Liu, Kun Dong, Xiao-Feng Du, Zhe Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhen HuaShandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Feng-Ting ZhaiThe First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Jinhui TianEvidence-based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Cheng-Fei GaoCenter of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-7662
Peng XuCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Fan ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Si-Jia LiuLiaoning Traditional Chinese Medicine of Jiahe, Shenyang, China.
Kun DongLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Xiao-Feng DuLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Zhe ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China pedtrainzhzh7676@163.com yangguanlin945@gmail.com.
Guanlin YangLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China pedtrainzhzh7676@163.com yangguanlin945@gmail.com.
Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAffiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChangchun University of Chinese Medicine · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKLanzhou University · CNShandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchieving efficacious and safe treatments for unstable angina pectoris (UAP) is still a challenging clinical problem. The availability of different oral Chinese patent medicines frequently poses a practical challenge to clinicians, namely, which one to choose as first-line regimen for treatment. This study aims to examine the comparative effectiveness and safety of oral Chinese patent medicines for UAP on the national essential drugs list of China. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of all randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of oral Chinese patent medicines as adjuvant for the treatment of UAP. We will explore eight electronic databases from their inception to June 2018 and search for grey literature. Primary outcomes include mortality and the cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes include: (1) symptom improvement; (2) ECG improvement; (3) frequency of acute angina attack; (4) duration of angina; (5) adverse effects. Two independent authors will screen titles and abstracts, review full texts, extract data, assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and assess the quality of evidence and strength of the recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). If adequate data are available, NMA will be performed with Bayesian analysis methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The NMA will help us to reduce the uncertainty of interventions and help clinicians to make optimal and more accurate therapeutic decisions for adults with UAP. Therefore, we will publish the findings of this study in a peer-reviewed journal. No ethics approval is necessary for this study based on the nature of its design. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018092822.

Indexed as

Drugs, EssentialAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAdministration, OralAngina, UnstableChinaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicNonprescription DrugsResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAdjuvants, PharmaceuticDrugs, Chinese HerbalDrugs, EssentialNonprescription DrugsAngina, UnstableNetwork meta-analysisProtocolTraditional Chinese Medicine

Identifiers

PMID31542734
PMCPMC6756357
OpenAlexW2974925794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.