Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542712›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2020

Media content sharing as a value-based decision.

Christin Scholz, Mia Jovanova, Elisa C Baek, Emily B Falk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neural signals predict information sharing across cultures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Brain system integration and message consistent health behavior change.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.scholz@uva.nl.
Mia JovanovaAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA.
Elisa C BaekAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Walnut Street, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA; Marketing Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3733 Spruce Street, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA. Electronic address: emily.falk@asc.upenn.edu.

Funding

Cancer prevention through neural and geospatial examination of tobacco marketing effects in smokersR01CA229305 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Emily Falk · 2019 to 2026
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to media content (e.g. persuasive campaigns) affects daily behaviors, but these effects are partially determined by whether and how people who are exposed to the content share it with their peers. To decide whether to share, potential sharers need to compare and integrate diverse sources of information including characteristics of the media content and various social influences. What are the mechanisms that enable sharers to make such complex decisions quickly and effortlessly? We review evidence that sharing is preceded by a value-based decision-making process supported by three key characteristics of the so-called neural valuation system (domain-generality, value integration, and context-dependence). Finally, we describe theoretical and methodological advances that can be gained from conceptualizing sharing as a value-based decision-making process.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSelf DisclosureSocial BehaviorSocial MediaHumans

Identifiers

PMID31542712
PMCPMC12359073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.