ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2019
A robust computational framework for estimating 3D Bi-Atrial chamber wall thickness.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical image analysis on left atrial LGE MRI for atrial fibrillation studies: A review.Medical image analysis · 2022Pooled it
- Structural determinants of re-entrant drivers in atrial fibrillation: insights from digital twins derived from 3D micrometre-resolution imaging of human heart.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Automatic Bi-Atrial Segmentation and Biomarker Extraction from Late Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI Using Deep Learning.Expert systems with applications · 2025Article
- Defining myocardial fiber bundle architecture in atrial digital twins.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A novel network with enhanced edge information for left atrium segmentation from LGE-MRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Chamber-specific wall thickness features in human atrial fibrillation.Interface focus · 2023Article
- Understanding PITX2-Dependent Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms through Computational Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Comprehensive evaluation of electrophysiological and 3D structural features of human atrial myocardium with insights on atrial fibrillation maintenance mechanisms.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2020Review
- Mini Review: Deep Learning for Atrial Segmentation From Late Gadolinium-Enhanced MRIs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Unified mechanism of local drivers in a percolation model of atrial fibrillation.Physical review. E · 2019Article
- Identifying Potential Re-Entrant Circuit Locations From Atrial Fibre Maps.Computing in cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent form of cardiac arrhythmia. The atrial wall thickness (AWT) can potentially improve our understanding of the mechanism underlying atrial structure that drives AF and provides important clinical information. However, most existing studies for estimating AWT rely on ruler-based measurements performed on only a few selected locations in 2D or 3D using digital calipers. Only a few studies have developed automatic approaches to estimate the AWT in the left atrium, and there are currently no methods to robustly estimate the AWT of both atrial chambers. Therefore, we have developed a computational pipeline to automatically calculate the 3D AWT across bi-atrial chambers and extensively validated our pipeline on both ex vivo and in vivo human atria data. The atrial geometry was first obtained by segmenting the atrial wall from the MRIs using a novel machine learning approach. The epicardial and endocardial surfaces were then separated using a multi-planar convex hull approach to define boundary conditions, from which, a Laplace equation was solved numerically to automatically separate bi-atrial chambers. To robustly estimate the AWT in each atrial chamber, coupled partial differential equations by coupling the Laplace solution with two surface trajectory functions were formulated and solved. Our pipeline enabled the reconstruction and visualization of the 3D AWT for bi-atrial chambers with a relative error of 8% and outperformed existing algorithms by >7%. Our approach can potentially lead to improved clinical diagnosis, patient stratification, and clinical guidance during ablation treatment for patients with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.