Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Shannon M SheppardSan Diego State University, USA; University of California, San Diego, USA. Electronic address: sheppard@jhmi.edu.
Tracy LoveSan Diego State University, USA; University of California, San Diego, USA.
Katherine J MidgleySan Diego State University, USA.
Lewis P ShapiroSan Diego State University, USA; University of California, San Diego, USA.
Phillip J HolcombSan Diego State University, USA.
San Diego State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US
Funding
Neurocognitive Approaches to Communication DisordersT32DC007361 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tracy Love-Geffen · 2005 to 2026
$3.9M
The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
SENTENCE PROCESSING IN NORMAL AND APHASIC POPULATIONSR01DC000494 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 1995 to 2011
$3.0M
The cognitive neuroscience of word comprehensionR01HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 1995 to 2010
$2.8M
The temporal characteristics of brain-language relationships: Evidence from impaiR01DC009272 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY, SHAPIRO, LEWIS P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Perfusion informed lesion mapping in aphasiaR21DC015263 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE-GEFFEN, TRACY · 2015 to 2016
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Using prosody during sentence processing in aphasia: Evidence from temporal neural dynamics. · full record | OpenQuestion