Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542329›Full record

ReviewNeurobiology of learning and memory2019

Changes in cerebellar intrinsic neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity result from eyeblink conditioning.

Bernard G Schreurs

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intrinsic Excitability Increase in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells after Delay Eye-Blink Conditioning in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard G SchreursDepartment of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States. Electronic address: bschreurs@hsc.wvu.edu.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

Learning-specific synaptic and membrane changes in deep cerebellar nucleiR21NS094009 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SCHREURS, BERNARD G. · 2015 to 2016
$411k
Plasticity in deep cerebellar nuclei as a function of classical conditioningR21NS061103 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SCHREURS, BERNARD G. · 2009 to 2010
$403k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS061103NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS094009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a long history of research documenting plasticity in the cerebellum as well as the role of the cerebellum in learning and memory. Recordings in slices of cerebellum have provided evidence of long-term depression and long-term potentiation at several excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Lesions and recordings show the cerebellum is crucial for eyeblink conditioning and it appears changes in both synaptic and membrane plasticity are involved. In addition to its role in fine motor control, there is growing consensus that the cerebellum is crucial for perceptual, cognitive, and emotional functions. In the current review, we explore the evidence that eyeblink conditioning results in significant changes in intrinsic membrane excitability as well as synaptic plasticity in Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex in rabbits and changes in intrinsic membrane excitability in principal neurons of the deep cerebellar nuclei in rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumConditioning, EyelidNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPurkinje CellsRabbitsCerebellumEyeblink conditioningIntrinsic membrane excitabilityPurkinje cellRabbitSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID31542329
PMCPMC6879800
OpenAlexW2974321814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.