Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542143›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2019

The Minnesota SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Model of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarette Use.

David T Levy, Zhe Yuan, Yameng Li, Ann W St Claire, Barbara A Schillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Smoking Histories by State in the U.S.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Kentucky SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Model of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarette Use.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David T LevyDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: dl777@georgetown.edu.
Zhe YuanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Yameng LiLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.
Ann W St ClaireEvaluation and Survey Research, ClearWay Minnesota(SM), Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Barbara A SchilloSchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Control PoliciesU01CA152956 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, KONG, CHUNG YIN · 2010 to 2014
$7.4M
MODELING THE POLICY IMPACT OF CIGARETTE AND SMOKELESS USE ON US MORTALITYR01DA036497 · NIDA · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, DAVID THEODORE · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152956NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA previous Minnesota SimSmoke tobacco control policy model is extended to more recent years and to include smokeless tobacco use.

methodsUsing data from the 1993 Tobacco Use Supplement and information on state policies, the Minnesota SimSmoke model was updated and extended to incorporate smokeless tobacco (both exclusive and dual use) and smokeless tobacco-attributable deaths. The model was then validated against the 2002, 2006/2007, and 2014/2015 Tobacco Use Supplement and the 1999, 2007, 2014, and 2018 Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey and used to estimate the impact of policies implemented between 1993 and 2018. Analysis was conducted in April 2019.

resultsThe model validated well for cigarette and earlier smokeless tobacco use, but it predicted smokeless tobacco use less well in recent years. The model projected that male (female) smoking prevalence was 35% (36%) lower in relative terms by 2018 and 43% (44%) lower by 2040 owing to policies, with lesser reductions projected for male smokeless tobacco use. Tobacco-attributable deaths were reduced by 7,800 by 2018 and 46,900 by 2040. Price increases, primarily through taxes, were projected to have had the greatest impact on cigarette use followed by smoke-free air laws, cessation treatment policies, tobacco control campaign expenditures, and youth access enforcement. Similar effects were projected for smokeless tobacco use, except that smoke-free air laws had smaller effects.

conclusionsAs cigarettes remain the dominant form of nicotine delivery product, cigarette-oriented policies may be an effective means of reducing the use of all nicotine delivery products. However, noncigarette-oriented policies may also play an important role.

Indexed as

Public PolicySmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaModels, TheoreticalSmokingTobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31542143
PMCPMC6756173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.