Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31542052›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2019

Development of stimuli-responsive nano-based pesticides: emerging opportunities for agriculture.

Marcela Candido Camara, Estefânia Vangelie Ramos Campos, Renata Aparecida Monteiro, Anderson do Espirito Santo Pereira, Patrícia Luiza de Freitas Proença, Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcela Candido CamaraSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Estefânia Vangelie Ramos CamposSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Renata Aparecida MonteiroSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Anderson do Espirito Santo PereiraSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia Luiza de Freitas ProençaSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo Fernandes FracetoSão Paulo State University - UNESP, Institute of Science and Technology, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil. leonardo.fraceto@unesp.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico #155959/2018-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.351694/2019-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/21004-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2017/24402-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides and fertilizers are widely used to enhance agriculture yields, although the fraction of the pesticides applied in the field that reaches the targets is less than 0.1%. Such indiscriminate use of chemical pesticides is disadvantageous due to the cost implications and increasing human health and environmental concerns. In recent years, the utilization of nanotechnology to create novel formulations has shown great potential for diminishing the indiscriminate use of pesticides and providing environmentally safer alternatives. Smart nano-based pesticides are designed to efficiently delivery sufficient amounts of active ingredients in response to biotic and/or abiotic stressors that act as triggers, employing targeted and controlled release mechanisms. This review discusses the current status of stimuli-responsive release systems with potential to be used in agriculture, highlighting the challenges and drawbacks that need to be overcome in order to accelerate the global commercialization of smart nanopesticides.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimalsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanostructuresNanotechnologyPesticidesStress, PhysiologicalDelayed-Action PreparationsPesticidesAbiotic stressBiotic stressNanopesticidesSmart deliverySustainable agricultureTriggered release

Identifiers

PMID31542052
PMCPMC6754856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.