Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541578›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2020

Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator.

Stephanie M Harris, Sébastien Descamps, Lynne U Sneddon, Philip Bertrand, Olivier Chastel, Samantha C Patrick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An ecologically sound and participatory monitoring network for pan-Arctic seabirds.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephanie M HarrisSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-9444
Sébastien DescampsNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0590-9013
Lynne U SneddonInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9787-3948
Philip BertrandNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-6556
Olivier ChastelCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372 CNRS Université de La Rochelle, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Samantha C PatrickSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-944X
University of Liverpool · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNorwegian Polar Institute · NOUniversité du Québec à Rimouski · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal populations are often comprised of both foraging specialists and generalists. For instance, some individuals show higher foraging site fidelity (spatial specialization) than others. Such individual differences in degree of specialization can persist over time-scales of months or even years in long-lived animals, but the mechanisms leading to these different individual strategies are not fully understood. There is accumulating evidence that individual variation in foraging behaviour is shaped by animal personality traits, such as boldness. Despite this, the potential for boldness to drive differences in the degree of specialization is unknown. In this study, we used novel object tests to measure boldness in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) breeding at four colonies in Svalbard and deployed GPS loggers to examine their at-sea foraging behaviour. We estimated the repeatability of foraging trips and used a hidden Markov model to identify locations of foraging sites in order to quantify individual foraging site fidelity. Across the breeding season, bolder birds were more repeatable than shy individuals in the distance and range of their foraging trips, and during the incubation period (but not chick rearing), bolder individuals were more site-faithful. Birds exhibited these differences while showing high spatial similarity in foraging areas, indicating that site selection was not driven by personality-dependent spatial partitioning. We instead suggest that a relationship between boldness and site fidelity may be driven by differences in behavioural flexibility between bold and shy individuals. Together, these results provide a potential mechanism by which widely reported individual differences in foraging specialization may emerge.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesFeeding BehaviorAnimalsBirdsPersonalitySvalbardbiologgingboldnessforaging niche widthforaging specializationmarine vertebratemovement ecologypersonalitysite fidelity

Identifiers

PMID31541578
PMCPMC7004082
OpenAlexW2974640015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.