ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
Serum Levels of Complement Factors C1q, Bb, and H in Normal Pregnancy and Severe Pre-Eclampsia.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of the complement components as potential biomarkers of pre-eclampsia: pitfalls and opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction Models for Late-Onset Preeclampsia: A Study Based on Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting Models.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The complement system in human pregnancy and preeclampsia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Low Levels of Complement Factor H in the First Trimester of Pregnancy Are Associated with Spontaneous Preterm Birth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Protective role of complement factor H against the development of preeclampsia.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Pre-eclampsia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Animal models of preeclampsia: investigating pathophysiology and therapeutic targets.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Review
- Relationship of Placental and Serum Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Levels with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.International journal of women's health · 2022Article
- A longitudinal study of C1q and anti-C1q autoantibodies in homologous and heterologous pregnancies for predicting pre-eclampsia.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Circulating Levels of Anti-C1q and Anti-Factor H Autoantibodies and Their Targets in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Beyond Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome: The Relevance of Complement From Pathogenesis to Pregnancy Outcome in Other Systemic Rheumatologic Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Placental Ischemia Says "NO" to Proper NOS-Mediated Control of Vascular Tone and Blood Pressure in Preeclampsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Predictive values of various serum biomarkers in women with suspected preeclampsia: A prospective study.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Adipsin of the Alternative Complement Pathway Is a Potential Predictor for Preeclampsia in Early Pregnancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Key Innate Immune Cells in Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- The Complement System in the Pathophysiology of Pregnancy and in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases During Pregnancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the diagnostic role of serum levels of complement C1q, Bb, and H in nonpregnant women, women with normal pregnancy, and women with severe pre-eclampsia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Healthy nonpregnant women (n=30), women with early, middle, and late normal pregnancy (n=30, respectively), and women with severe pre-eclampsia (n=73) were studied. The pre-eclampsia study group included early-onset cases (n=43) and late-onset cases (n=30). Serum levels of Bb were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and C1q and H were tested by a turbidimetric immunoassay method. RESULTS In the pre-eclampsia study group, compared with women with normal pregnancy, serum levels of C1q remained stable throughout pregnancy, and Bb levels declined from mid-pregnancy (p=0.250). Serum levels of factor H increased in the middle and late stages of pregnancy, and C1q and H were lower in early-onset severe pre-eclampsia (p<0.001, p=0.009, respectively) and late-onset severe pre-eclampsia (p<0.001, p=0.031, respectively) compared with the early-onset control and late-onset control groups. Serum levels of Bb increased in early-onset severe pre-eclampsia (p=0.001) and late-onset severe pre-eclampsia (p=0.003) compared with early-onset control and late-onset control groups. The area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) for serum C1q, Bb, and H for the diagnosis of early-onset severe pre-eclampsia were 0.814 (95% CI, 0.712-0.917), 0.743 (95% CI, 0.638-0.859), and 0.681(95% CI, 0.556-0.806), and late-onset severe pre-eclampsia were 0.805 (95% CI, 0.694-0.913), 0.796 (95% CI, 0.680-0.911), and 0.662 (95% CI, 0.524-0.800). CONCLUSIONS The classical and alternative pathways of complement were activated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Serum levels of C1q, Bb, and H should be studied further as potential diagnostic markers for severe pre-eclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.