ArticleGenetic epidemiology2020
Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes using a clustering linear combination method based on hierarchical clustering.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for extremely unbalanced case-control association studies using multi-layer network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A clustering linear combination method for multiple phenotype association studies based on GWAS summary statistics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Using Summary Statistics to Model Multiplicative Combinations of Initially Analyzed Phenotypes With a Flexible Choice of Covariates.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that a genetic variant can affect multiple phenotypes, especially in complex human diseases. Therefore, joint analysis of multiple phenotypes may offer new insights into disease etiology. Recently, many statistical methods have been developed for joint analysis of multiple phenotypes, including the clustering linear combination (CLC) method. Due to the unknown number of clusters for a given data, a simulation procedure must be used to evaluate the p-value of the final test statistic of CLC. This makes the CLC method computationally demanding. In this paper, we use a stopping criterion to determine the number of clusters in the CLC method. We have named our method, hierarchical clustering CLC (HCLC). HCLC has an asymptotic distribution, which is very computationally efficient and makes it applicable for genome-wide association studies. Extensive simulations together with the COPDGene data analysis have been used to assess the type I error rates and power of our proposed method. Our simulation results demonstrate that the type I error rates of HCLC are effectively controlled in different realistic settings. HCLC either outperforms all other methods or has statistical power that is very close to the most powerful method with which it has been compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.