Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541415›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2020

Towards a Framework for Research Ethics Education for Physicians in Serbia.

Tatjana Gazibara, Jelena Dotlic, Dejan Donev, Vida Jeremic Stojkovic, Darija Kisic-Tepavcevic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tatjana GazibaraInstitute of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26A, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia. tatjanagazibara@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-8375
Jelena DotlicClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejan DonevInstitute for Philosophy, School of Philosophy, University "St. Cyril and Methodius", Bul. Goce Delchev 9A, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Vida Jeremic StojkovicDepartment of Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 8, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Darija Kisic-TepavcevicInstitute of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Visegradska 26A, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With growing opportunities for medical doctors to work either in academia and industry, research ethics education for health sciences research, meaning research which includes humans and animals and/or their tissues and cells with the goal to understand underlying mechanisms of disease occurrence and disease treatment, is of paramount importance, especially in regions, such as Serbia, where comprehensive research ethics curricula for physician researchers are lacking. This article addresses the spectrum of research ethics topics that were identified through analysis of the existing research ethics curricula in medical schools, international organizations, Serbian legislative codes and the PubMed database applying the key search terms: ethics, research, biomedical, education, curriculum, program, course and their combinations. Selected topics were classified in eight syllabi based on their similarity: #1 Responsible conduct of research, #2 Justice in human subjects research, #3 Research on human subjects, #4 Vulnerable population groups, #5 Conflict of interest, #6 Research on animals, #7 Research on genes, cells and embryos, and #8 Organization of research ethics. Justifications for each syllabus are discussed based on empirical evidence and local context. Higher education authorities could use this framework to strengthen, adjust or refine research ethics education for physician researchers in Serbia.

Indexed as

CurriculumPhysiciansEthics, MedicalEthics, ResearchHumansSchools, MedicalSerbiaCurriculumEducationEthicsMedicineResearch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.