Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541361›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2020

A Multinational European Study of Patient Preferences for Novel Diagnostics to Manage Antimicrobial Resistance.

David J Mott, Grace Hampson, Martin J Llewelyn, Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Michael M Hopkins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David J MottOffice of Health Economics, Southside, 7th Floor, 105 Victoria Street, London, UK. dmott@ohe.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-8447
Grace HampsonOffice of Health Economics, Southside, 7th Floor, 105 Victoria Street, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-1268
Martin J LlewelynBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-1124
Jorge Mestre-FerrandizOffice of Health Economics, Southside, 7th Floor, 105 Victoria Street, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-1321
Michael M HopkinsScience Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School, Jubilee Building, Falmer, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8401-6573
Office Of Health Economics · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N014316/1UK Research and Innovation MR/N014316/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel diagnostics are needed to manage antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Patient preferences are important in determining whether diagnostic tests are successful in practice, but there are few data describing the test attributes which matter most to patients. We elicited patients' preferences for attributes of diagnostic tests that could be used to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in primary care across seven European countries.

methodsWe used an online stated preference survey, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE explored how patients make trade-offs between three key attributes of diagnostic tests: the speed that results were available, confidence in the test results, and how convenient it is to take the test. Individuals were eligible to complete the survey if they had taken antibiotics within the last 2 years and were resident in Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Greece, the Netherlands or the United Kingdom (UK).

resultsIn total, 988 respondents completed the survey. The DCE responses illustrated that speed was the least important attribute in most countries. Responses from Germany and the Netherlands indicated that confidence was most important in these countries. Responses from the UK, France, Spain and Italy showed convenience as the most important attribute in these countries. Two attributes, confidence and convenience, were jointly favoured by respondents in Greece.

conclusionPatients in different European countries do not have the same preferences for the attributes of diagnostic tests to manage AMR in primary care. Failure to account for such differences during test development could reduce test uptake, result in continued overuse of antibiotics, and hamper marketisation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceUnnecessary ProceduresYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31541361
PMCPMC6978300
OpenAlexW2974657905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.