ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019
[Position paper on medical cannabis and cannabis-based medicines in pain medicine].
Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Cannabis and cannabinoids for the treatment of acute and chronic pain].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Pooled it
- [Patient-reported outcomes in chronic diseases under treatment with cannabis medicines : Analysis of the results of the Copeia survey].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Overview: Chronic Pain and Cannabis-Based Medicines.Pharmacopsychiatry · 2024Review
- [Complementary and alternative medicine-An option for chronic pain patients?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- [Cannabinoids reduce opioid use in older patients with pain : Retrospective three-year analysis of data from a general practice].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- The evolving culture of medical cannabis in Canada for the management of chronic pain.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Review
- [Diagnostics and therapy of neuropathic pain].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- [The green rush-worse than feared? : Data on the misuse of medical cannabis].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Article
- [Three years of cannabis as medicine-preliminary results of the survey accompanying the prescription of medical cannabis in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021Article
- [How long does a long-term therapy last?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Article
- [Medicinal cannabis and cannabis-based medication: an appeal to physicians, journalists, health insurances, and politicians for their responsible handling].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
- Medical Cannabis Alleviates Chronic Neuropathic Pain Effectively and Sustainably without Severe Adverse Effect: A Retrospective Study on 99 Cases.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since March 2017, the prescription of medical cannabis at the expense of the statutory health insurance is possible after approval by the respective medical services. Chronic pain is the most common indication, as health claims data and the accompanying survey show. From the point of view of the law, a prescription is indicated in cases of serious illness, missing or not indicated established therapeutic approaches and a not entirely remote prospect of improvement of the illness or its symptoms. This describes a broader indication spectrum than can currently be based on randomised controlled clinical trials. There is weak evidence of low efficacy for neuropathic pain. For pain related to spasticity and cancer-related pain there is evidence of improvements in quality of life, but effects on pain are of little relevance. For all other indications, only an individual therapeutic trial can be justified based on the available external evidence. However, this usually corresponds to the demand of "a not entirely remote prospect" of a noticeably positive effect of medical cannabis. It is also problematic that almost no long-term studies for the application and efficacy of flowers and extracts are available.Current knowledge on the use of cannabis-based drugs and, more clearly, medical cannabis for chronic pain is insufficient. The increase in the number of countries with marketing authorisations or exemptions for medicinal cannabis or cannabis-based drugs for chronic pain will also pave the way for larger empirical and population-based studies that will further improve the evidence base of research and clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.