Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541286›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019

[Imaging diagnostics in large vessel vasculitis].

W A Schmidt, W Hartung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W A SchmidtRheumaklinik Berlin-Buch, Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin, Lindenberger Weg 19, 13125, Berlin, Deutschland. w.schmidt@immanuel.de.
W HartungKlinik für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Asklepios Klinik, Bad Abbach, Deutschland.
Asklepios Kliniken Bad Abbach · DEImmanuel Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging procedures have become an important diagnostic tool in vasculitis. In large vessel vasculitides, such as giant-cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) can depict specific abnormalities of the arterial wall. A clinically suspected diagnosis can be confirmed by imaging if performed by a trained specialist using appropriate equipment, without histological investigations. Ultrasound, MRI and CT show a homogeneous, concentric thickening of the arterial wall and PET can detect increased glucose metabolism of the arterial wall. Ultrasound is the method of choice, especially in predominantly cranial GCA. Imaging should be performed before or within the first few days of glucocorticoid treatment as the PET findings of all arteries as well as ultrasound and MRI findings in temporal arteries normalize quickly with treatment. A planned imaging examination must not delay initiation of glucocorticoid treatment.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisMultimodal ImagingTakayasu ArteritisFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsGiant-cell arteritisMagnetic resonance imagingPositron emission tomographyTakayasu arteritisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31541286
OpenAlexW2973611597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.