Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541283›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Advances in CNS PET: the state-of-the-art for new imaging targets for pathophysiology and drug development.

Stuart P McCluskey, Christophe Plisson, Eugenii A Rabiner, Oliver Howes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Development of [Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Synaptic changes in psychiatric and neurological disorders: state-of-the art of in vivo imaging.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biomarker Methodologies: A NIMH Perspective.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Redox and Immune Signaling in Schizophrenia: New Therapeutic Potential.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stuart P McCluskeyInvicro LLC, A Konica Minolta Company, Burlington Danes Building, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. stuart.mccluskey@invicro.co.uk.
Christophe PlissonInvicro LLC, A Konica Minolta Company, Burlington Danes Building, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Eugenii A RabinerInvicro LLC, A Konica Minolta Company, Burlington Danes Building, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Oliver HowesPsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council MC-A656-5QD30Medical Research Council MC_U120097115Medical Research Council MR/L022176/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Medical Research Council MR/N027078/1Wellcome Trust 094849/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA limit on developing new treatments for a number of central nervous system (CNS) disorders has been the inadequate understanding of the in vivo pathophysiology underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders and the lack of in vivo tools to determine brain penetrance, target engagement, and relevant molecular activity of novel drugs. Molecular neuroimaging provides the tools to address this. This article aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of new PET tracers for CNS targets, focusing on developments in the last 5 years for targets recently available for in-human imaging.

methodsWe provide an overview of the criteria used to evaluate PET tracers. We then used the National Institute of Mental Health Research Priorities list to identify the key CNS targets. We conducted a PubMed search (search period 1st of January 2013 to 31st of December 2018), which yielded 40 new PET tracers across 16 CNS targets which met our selectivity criteria. For each tracer, we summarised the evidence of its properties and potential for use in studies of CNS pathophysiology and drug evaluation, including its target selectivity and affinity, inter and intra-subject variability, and pharmacokinetic parameters. We also consider its potential limitations and missing characterisation data, but not specific applications in drug development. Where multiple tracers were present for a target, we provide a comparison of their properties. RESULTS AND

conclusionsOur review shows that multiple new tracers have been developed for proteinopathy targets, particularly tau, as well as the purinoceptor P2X7, phosphodiesterase enzyme PDE10A, and synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), amongst others. Some of the most promising of these include

Indexed as

BrainDrug DevelopmentPositron-Emission TomographyHumansPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesReproducibility of ResultsPDE10A protein, humanPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesBrainCNSFirst-in-humanPET

Identifiers

PMID31541283
PMCPMC6974496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.