Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541243›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2020

Selective Intensive Care Unit Admission After Adult Supratentorial Tumor Craniotomy: Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs.

Mark Ter Laan, Suzanne Roelofs, Ineke Van Huet, Eddy M M Adang, Ronald H M A Bartels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark Ter LaanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Suzanne RoelofsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ineke Van HuetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eddy M M AdangDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ronald H M A BartelsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmitting patients to an intensive care or medium care unit (ICU/MCU) after adult supratentorial tumor craniotomy remains common practice even though some studies have suggested lower level care is sufficient for selected patients. We have introduced a "no ICU, unless" policy for tumor craniotomy patients.

objectiveTo provide a quieter postoperative environment for patients, reduce the burden on the ICU department, and to evaluate whether costs can be reduced.

methodsA cohort study was performed comparing patients that underwent tumor craniotomy for supratentorial tumors during 1 yr after introduction (n = 109) of the new policy with the year before (n = 107). Rate of complications was evaluated, as was the length of stay and patient satisfaction using qualitative evaluation. Finally, costs were evaluated comparing the situation before and after implementation of the new protocol.

resultsA reduction in ICU/MCU admittance from 64% to 24% of patients was found resulting in 13.3% cost reduction (€1950 per case), without increasing the length of stay at the ward. The length of stay in the hospital was similar. Complications were significantly reduced after implementing the new policy (0.98 vs 0.53 per patient, P = .003). Patients that were interviewed after the new policy reported feeling safe and at ease at the ward.

conclusionChanging our policy from "ICU, unless" to "no ICU, unless" reduced complication rates and length of stay in the hospital while keeping patients satisfied. Hospital costs related to the admission have been significantly reduced by the new policy.

Indexed as

CraniotomyIntensive Care UnitsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsSupratentorial NeoplasmsBrain tumorHealthcare costsNeurosurgeryPostoperative careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31541243
PMCPMC6911731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.