Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541205›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2020

Outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation and receive active therapy. A retrospective analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

E González-Barca, A Boumendil, D Blaise, M Trněný, T Masszi, H Finel, M G Michieli, J T Bittenbring, G Gritti, J A Snowden and 19 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Low-FrequencyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

E González-BarcaInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain. e.gonzalez@iconcologia.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-1508
A BoumendilEBMT Paris Study Office, Paris, France.
D BlaiseInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Department of Hematology, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-9447
M Trněný1st Charles University General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
T MassziSt. István and St. Laszlo Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
H FinelEBMT Paris Study Office, Paris, France.
M G MichieliCentro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.
J T BittenbringUniversity of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
G GrittiPapa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
J A SnowdenSheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
M BishtonDepartment of Hematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
B BrunoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
S González de VillambrosiaDepartment of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
A JanikovaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
X LeleuService D'Hématologie Et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hopital de La Milétrie, Poitiers, France.
A AnagnostopoulosHematology Department & HCT Unit, G. Papanikolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-9031
X PoiréSection of Hematology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1897-0227
M CrysandtDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Z N ÖzkurtGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
E VandenbergheSt James Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
M Itälä-RemesTurku University Hospital, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Turku, Finland.
J Y CahnDepartment of Hematology, Hopital A. Michallon, Grenoble, FRA, France.
E JantunenUniversity of Eastern Finland/Institute of Clinical Medicine/Internal Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
W SchroyensUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Dept. of Hematology, Antwerp, Belgium.
J MaertensDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Dept. of Hematology, Leuven, Belgium.
A EsquirolHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Clinical Hematology Service, Barcelona, Spain.
P DregerDepartment of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
S MontotoHaemato-Oncology Department, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
A SuredaInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse/progress after first line chemoimmunotherapy. Long-term outcome of those who relapse after transplant is poor. We present the results of a retrospective study of 256 adult patients reported to the EBMT registry with DLBCL who relapsed after auto-HSCT performed between 2003 and 2013, and who received active salvage strategies. One hundred and fifty-four (60%) were male; median age was 53 years. Median time to relapse was 7 months, 65% relapsed during the first year. Overall response rate after salvage therapy was 46%. Median follow-up after first salvage therapy was 40 months (IQR 23-63 months). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 27% (95% CI 22-33). OS at 3 years of patients relapsing longer than 1 year after auto-HSCT was 41% (95% CI 31-53) compared with 20% (95% CI 14-24) in those who relapsed in less than 1 year. Eighty-two patients (32%) had a second HSCT, an allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in 69 cases, at a median time of 6.5 months after relapse. OS at 3 years after allo-HSCT was 36% (95% CI 25-51). In conclusion, the prognosis of patients with DLBCL that relapse after auto-HSCT is dismal. Patients who relapse in less than 1 year remain an unmet need, and should be considered for CAR T cell therapy or clinical trials. Patients who relapse after 1 year can be rescued with salvage therapies and a second HSCT. These results provide a benchmark to compare data of new prospective studies.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultBone MarrowDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.