Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541202›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Sibling competition does not magnify inbreeding depression in North American Arabidopsis lyrata.

Yan Li, Mark van Kleunen, Marc Stift

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SNP-RFLP Markers for the Study ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Reproductive Biology ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan LiEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, D-78457, Konstanz, Germany. yan.li@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-8253
Mark van KleunenEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, D-78457, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3701
Marc StiftEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, D-78457, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 388824294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About half of all angiosperms have some form of molecular self-incompatibility to promote outcrossing. If self-incompatibility breaks down, inbreeding depression (δ) is the main barrier to the evolution of self-fertilisation (selfing). If inbreeding depression is lower than 50% (δ < 0.5), the inherent transmission advantage of selfers should theoretically drive the evolution of selfing. However, this does not always happen in practice. For example, despite frequent breakdowns of self-incompatibility in North American Arabidopsis lyrata, selfing has only evolved in few populations. This is surprising given that previous inbreeding-depression estimates were well below the 0.5 threshold. Here, we test whether this could be due to underestimation of true inbreeding depression in competition-free environments. Specifically, we tested whether direct competition between crossed and selfed siblings magnified inbreeding-depression estimates in A. lyrata. We found that this was neither the case for belowground nor for aboveground biomass. For reproductive traits, there was hardly any significant inbreeding depression regardless of competition. Combined with previous findings that drought stress and inducing defence also did not magnify inbreeding depression, our results suggest that the relatively low estimates of inbreeding depression for biomass are indeed realistic estimates of the true inbreeding depression in North American A. lyrata.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationArabidopsisDroughtsInbreedingInbreeding DepressionPhenotypeSelf-FertilizationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31541202
PMCPMC6834581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.