Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31541124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparative analysis of the fecal microbiota from different species of domesticated and wild suids.

Florencia Correa-Fiz, Miguel Blanco-Fuertes, Maria J Navas, Anna Lacasta, Richard P Bishop, Naftaly Githaka, Cynthia Onzere, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Vanessa Almagro-Delgado, Jorge Martinez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Florencia Correa-FizIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain. flor.correa@irta.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-5871
Miguel Blanco-FuertesIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Maria J NavasIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Anna LacastaInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Richard P BishopInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Naftaly GithakaInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cynthia OnzereInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marie-Frédérique Le PotierANSES, laboratory of Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort, swine virology and immunology unit, 22440, Ploufragran, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3929-9129
Vanessa Almagro-DelgadoVeterinary service Zoo Barcelona, Parc Ciudadella s/n 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge MartinezIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Virginia AragonIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Fernando RodriguezIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEBarcelona Biomedical Research Park · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the microorganisms living in a symbiotic relationship in different animal body sites (microbiota) reside in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Several studies have shown that the microbiota is involved in host susceptibilities to pathogens. The fecal microbiota of domestic and wild suids was analyzed. Bacterial communities were determined from feces obtained from domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) raised under different conditions: specific-pathogen-free (SPF) pigs and domestic pigs from the same bred, and indigenous domestic pigs from a backyard farm in Kenya. Secondly, the fecal microbiota composition of the African swine fever (ASF) resistant warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus) from Africa and a European zoo was determined. African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating disease for domestic pigs. African animals showed the highest microbial diversity while the SPF pigs the lowest. Analysis of the core microbiota from warthogs (resistant to ASF) and pigs (susceptible to ASF) showed 45 shared OTUs, while 6 OTUs were exclusively present in resistant animals. These six OTUs were members of the Moraxellaceae family, Pseudomonadales order and Paludibacter, Anaeroplasma, Petrimonas, and Moraxella genera. Further characterization of these microbial communities should be performed to determine the potential involvement in ASF resistance.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsAnimals, WildDisease SusceptibilityFecesGastrointestinal TractKenyaMicrobiotaSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID31541124
PMCPMC6754420
OpenAlexW2973331225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.