Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31540399›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2019

Effects of Electrospinning on the Viability of Ten Species of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers.

Špela Zupančič, Katja Škrlec, Petra Kocbek, Julijana Kristl, Aleš Berlec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Evaluation of Safety and Probiotic Properties ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Rapid-dissolving electrospun nanofibers for intra-vaginal antibiotic or probiotic delivery.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Špela ZupančičFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. spela.zupancic@ffa.uni-lj.si.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-5891
Katja ŠkrlecDepartment of Biotechnology, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. katja.luzarskrlec@gmail.com.
Petra KocbekFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. petra.kocbek@ffa.uni-lj.si.ORCID 0000-0002-6778-3295
Julijana KristlFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. julijana.kristl@ffa.uni-lj.si.
Aleš BerlecFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. ales.berlec@ijs.si.

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS J1-9194Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P1-0189Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P4-0127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria can have beneficial health effects and be used for the treatment of various diseases. However, there remains the challenge of encapsulating probiotics into delivery systems with a high viability and encapsulation efficacy. The electrospinning of bacteria is a novel and little-studied method, and further investigation of its promising potential is needed. Here, the morphology, zeta potential, hydrophobicity, average cell mass, and growth characteristics of nine different species of

Indexed as

biotechnologydryingelectrospinningLactobacillusLactococcuslocal deliverynanofibersnanotechnologyprobioticsviability

Identifiers

PMID31540399
PMCPMC6781326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.