Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31540340›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2019

Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis of Heavy Charged Particles Radiation: Clinical and Environmental Implications.

Keywan Mortezaee, Masoud Najafi, Bagher Farhood, Amirhossein Ahmadi, Dheyauldeen Shabeeb, Ahmed Eleojo Musa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemo-/radiotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy: roles of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  2. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Low-Energy Electron Damage to Condensed-Phase DNA and Its Constituents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Keywan MortezaeeDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. keywan987@yahoo.com.
Masoud NajafiRadiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 6715847141, Iran. najafi_ma@yahoo.com.
Bagher FarhoodDepartments of Medical Physics and Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan 8715988141, Iran. bffarhood@gmail.com.
Amirhossein AhmadiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari 48175-861, Iran. amirhossein_pharma@yahoo.com.
Dheyauldeen ShabeebDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Misan, Misan 62010, Iraq. sazanatop5@yahoo.com.
Ahmed Eleojo MusaDepartment of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (International Campus), Tehran 1416753955, Iran. ahmed.eleojo.musa@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the uses of ionizing radiation is in cancer treatment. The use of heavy charged particles for treatment has been introduced in recent decades because of their priority for deposition of radiation energy in the tumor, via the Bragg peak phenomenon. In addition to medical implications, exposure to heavy charged particles is a crucial issue for environmental and space radiobiology. Ionizing radiation is one of the most powerful clastogenic and carcinogenic agents. Studies have shown that although both low and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiations are carcinogenic, their risks are different. Molecular studies have also shown that although heavy charged particles mainly induce DNA damage directly, they may be more potent inducer of endogenous generation of free radicals compared to the low LET gamma or X-rays. It seems that the severity of genotoxicity for non-irradiated bystander cells is potentiated as the quality of radiation increases. However, this is not true in all situations. Evidence suggests the involvement of some mechanisms such as upregulation of pro-oxidant enzymes and change in the methylation of DNA in the development of genomic instability and carcinogenesis. This review aimed to report important issues for genotoxicity of carcinogenic effects of heavy charged particles. Furthermore, we tried to explain some mechanisms that may be involved in cancer development following exposure to heavy charged particles.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGenomic InstabilityHumansNeoplasmsBystander EffectGenomic Instabilityheavy charged particlesLETNeoplasmradiation

Identifiers

PMID31540340
PMCPMC6780199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.