Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31540167›Full record

ArticleVaccines2019

Tick Bites Induce Anti-α-Gal Antibodies in Dogs.

Adnan Hodžić, Lourdes Mateos-Hernández, Michael Leschnik, Pilar Alberdi, Ryan O M Rego, Marinela Contreras, Margarita Villar, José de la Fuente, Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz, Georg Gerhard Duscher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Tick Saliva and the Alpha-Gal Syndrome: Finding a Needle in a Haystack.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Infection withVaccines · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Adnan HodžićDepartment of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria. adnan.hodzic@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Lourdes Mateos-HernándezSaBio, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.
Michael LeschnikDepartment for Companion Animals, Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria. michael.leschnik@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Pilar AlberdiSaBio, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. Maria.Alberdi@uclm.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6999-9735
Ryan O M RegoInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Center, Czech Academy of Sciences, 117 20 České Budějovice, Czech Republic. ryanrego@paru.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-6932-0940
Marinela ContrerasSaBio, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. marinela.contreras@uclm.es.
Margarita VillarSaBio, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. MargaritaM.Villar@uclm.es.
José de la FuenteSaBio, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC-CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain. josedejesus.fuente@uclm.es.
Alejandro Cabezas-CruzUMR BIPAR, INRA, ANSES, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94706 Maisons-Alfort, France. alejandro.cabezas@vet-alfort.fr.
Georg Gerhard DuscherDepartment of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria. georg.duscher@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRCzech Academy of Sciences · CZOklahoma State University · US

Funding

Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes, JCCM, Spain CCM17-PIC-036 (SBPLY/17/180501/000185)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the functional inactivation of the gene encoding for the enzyme that is involved in the oligosaccharide galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) synthesis, humans and Old-World primates are able to produce a large amount of antibodies against the glycan epitope. Apart from being involved in the hyperacute organ rejection in humans, anti-α-Gal antibodies have shown a protective effect against some pathogenic agents and an implication in the recently recognized tick-induced mammalian meat allergy. Conversely, non-primate mammals, including dogs, have the ability to synthetize α-Gal and, thus, their immune system is not expected to naturally generate the antibodies toward this self-antigen molecule. However, in the current study, we detected specific IgG, IgM, and IgE antibodies to α-Gal in sera of clinically healthy dogs by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the first time. Furthermore, in a tick infestation experiment, we showed that bites of

Indexed as

dogimmune responseIxodes ricinuspathogenstick biteα-Gal

Identifiers

PMID31540167
PMCPMC6789585
OpenAlexW2973055710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.