Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31540089›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Direct Intercellular Communications and Cancer: A Snapshot of the Biological Roles of Connexins in Prostate Cancer.

Catalina Asencio-Barría, Norah Defamie, Juan C Sáez, Marc Mesnil, Alejandro S Godoy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Connexins and Glucose Metabolism in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Endothelial Connexins in Developmental and Pathological Angiogenesis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Catalina Asencio-BarríaDepartmento de Fisiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.
Norah DefamieSTIM Laboratory, Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.
Juan C SáezDepartmento de Fisiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.
Marc MesnilSTIM Laboratory, Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-0365
Alejandro S GodoyDepartmento de Fisiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile. agodoy@bio.puc.cl.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversité de Poitiers · FRRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Comités de la Charente-Maritime et de la Vienne N/AFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1161115ICM-Economía P09-022-FU.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-12-1-0341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue homeostasis is the result of a complex intercellular network controlling the behavior of every cell for the survival of the whole organism. In mammalian tissues, cells do communicate via diverse long- and short-range communication mechanisms. While long-range communication involves hormones through blood circulation and neural transmission, short-range communication mechanisms include either paracrine diffusible factors or direct interactions (e.g., gap junctions, intercellular bridges and tunneling nanotubes) or a mixture of both (e.g., exosomes). Tumor growth represents an alteration of tissue homeostasis and could be the consequence of intercellular network disruption. In this network, direct short-range intercellular communication seems to be particularly involved. The first type of these intercellular communications thought to be involved in cancer progression were gap junctions and their protein subunits, the connexins. From these studies came the general assumption that global decreased connexin expression is correlated to tumor progression and increased cell proliferation. However, this assumption appeared more complicated by the fact that connexins may act also as pro-tumorigenic. Then, the concept that direct intercellular communication could be involved in cancer has been expanded to include new forms of intercellular communication such as tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) and exosomes. TNTs are intercellular bridges that allow free exchange of small molecules or even mitochondria depending on the presence of gap junctions. The majority of current research shows that such exchanges promote cancer progression by increasing resistance to hypoxia and chemotherapy. If exosomes are also involved in these mechanisms, more studies are needed to understand their precise role. Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a type of malignancy with one of the highest incidence rates worldwide. The precise role of these types of direct short-range intercellular communication has been considered in the progression of PCa. However, even though data are in favor of connexins playing a key role in PCa progression, a clear understanding of the role of TNTs and exosomes is needed to define their precise role in this malignancy. This review article summarizes the current view of the main mechanisms involved in short-range intercellular communication and their implications in cancer and delves into the biological, predictive and therapeutic role of connexins in PCa.

Indexed as

cancerconnexinsintercellular communicationprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31540089
PMCPMC6770088
OpenAlexW2972346403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.