Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31539603›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pain and symptom management2020

The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs With End-of-Life Decisions.

Alexia M Torke, George Fitchett, Saneta Maiko, Emily S Burke, James E Slaven, Beth Newton Watson, Steven Ivy, Patrick O Monahan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. South African speech-language therapists' practices regarding feeding tube placement in people with advanced dementia.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexia M TorkeIndiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address: atorke@iupui.edu.
George FitchettDepartment of Religion, Health and Human Values, College of Health Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Saneta MaikoIndiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana, USA.
Emily S BurkeIndiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
James E SlavenIU Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Beth Newton WatsonIndiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana, USA.
Steven IvyAssociation for Clinical Pastoral Education, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Patrick O MonahanIU Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Understanding the needs and experiences of surrogate decision makers caring for SGM individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.K24AG053794 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
Surrogate/Clinician Communication: The Family Inpatient Communication SurveyR01AG044408 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI TORKE, ALEXIA MARY · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053794NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAlthough religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life-sustaining treatments.

objectivesTo determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates.

methodsThis prospective observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2 and 10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange six months after enrollment identified the use of life-sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died.

resultsThere were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for do-not-resuscitate status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization.

conclusionFew religious variables are associated with end-of-life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHospice CareDeathHumansReligionSpiritualitydecision makingend of lifeproxyreligionSpiritualitysurrogate

Identifiers

PMID31539603
PMCPMC6989362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.