ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Correction: Comprehensively benchmarking applications for detecting copy number variation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Origins and Long-Term Patterns of Copy-Number Variation in Rhesus Macaques.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Comparative analyses of copy number variations between Bos taurus and Bos indicus.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Medium-coverage DNA sequencing in the design of the genetic association study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Developing the novel bioinformatics algorithms to systematically investigate the connections among survival time, key genes and proteins for Glioblastoma multiforme.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- inCNV: An Integrated Analysis Tool for Copy Number Variation on Whole Exome Sequencing.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007069.].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.