Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31539367›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

The inference of sex-biased human demography from whole-genome data.

Shaila Musharoff, Suyash Shringarpure, Carlos D Bustamante, Sohini Ramachandran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaila MusharoffDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6958-2366
Suyash ShringarpureDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6464-2668
Carlos D BustamanteDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sohini RamachandranCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9588-7964
Stanford University · USBrown University · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Clinically Relevant Genome Variation DatabaseU01HG007436 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, PLON, SHARON E. · 2013 to 2016
$10.5M
Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
Novel statistical methods to localize genomic elements underlying adaptive evolutionR01GM118652 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, SOHINI · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Genomic Origins and Admixture in Latinos (GOAL)R01GM090087 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, MARTIN, EDEN R. · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007436NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090087NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-biased demographic events ("sex-bias") involve unequal numbers of females and males. These events are typically inferred from the relative amount of X-chromosomal to autosomal genetic variation and have led to conflicting conclusions about human demographic history. Though population size changes alter the relative amount of X-chromosomal to autosomal genetic diversity even in the absence of sex-bias, this has generally not been accounted for in sex-bias estimators to date. Here, we present a novel method to identify sex-bias from genetic sequence data that models population size changes and estimates the female fraction of the effective population size during each time epoch. Compared to recent sex-bias inference methods, our approach can detect sex-bias that changes on a single population branch without requiring data from an outgroup or knowledge of divergence events. When applied to simulated data, conventional sex-bias estimators are biased by population size changes, especially recent growth or bottlenecks, while our estimator is unbiased. We next apply our method to high-coverage exome data from the 1000 Genomes Project and estimate a male bias in Yorubans (47% female) and Europeans (44%), possibly due to stronger background selection on the X chromosome than on the autosomes. Finally, we apply our method to the 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 high-coverage Complete Genomics whole-genome data and estimate a female bias in Yorubans (63% female), Europeans (84%), Punjabis (82%), as well as Peruvians (56%), and a male bias in the Southern Han Chinese (45%). Our method additionally identifies a male-biased migration out of Africa based on data from Europeans (20% female). Our results demonstrate that modeling population size change is necessary to estimate sex-bias parameters accurately. Our approach gives insight into signatures of sex-bias in sexual species, and the demographic models it produces can serve as more accurate null models for tests of selection.

Indexed as

BiasChromosomes, Human, XDemographyFemaleGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomeHumansMaleModels, GeneticPopulation DensitySelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31539367
PMCPMC6774570
OpenAlexW2974384546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.