Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31539341›Full record

ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2019

Sepsis in Pregnancy: Recognition and Resuscitation.

Rachel E Bridwell, Brandon M Carius, Brit Long, Joshua J Oliver, Gillian Schmitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating a Sepsis Screening Tool in the Outpatient Setting.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sepsis in the Parturient.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. COVID-19 in third trimester of pregnancy.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel E BridwellBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Brandon M CariusBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Brit LongBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Joshua J OliverBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
Gillian SchmitzBrooke Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The normal physiologic changes of pregnancy complicate evaluation for sepsis and subsequent management. Previous sepsis studies have specifically excluded pregnant patients. This narrative review evaluates the presentation, scoring systems for risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of sepsis in pregnancy. Sepsis is potentially fatal, but literature for the evaluation and treatment of this condition in pregnancy is scarce. While the definition and considerations of sepsis have changed with large, randomized controlled trials, pregnancy has consistently been among the exclusion criteria. The two pregnancy-specific sepsis scoring systems, the modified obstetric early warning scoring system (MOEWS) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS), present a number of limitations for application in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods of generation and subsequently limited validation leave significant gaps in identification of septic pregnant patients. Management requires consideration of a variety of sources in the septic pregnant patient. The underlying physiologic nature of pregnancy also highlights the need to individualize resuscitation and critical care efforts in this unique patient population. Pregnant septic patients require specific considerations and treatment goals to provide optimal care for this particular population. Guidelines and scoring systems currently exist, but further studies are required.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalCritical CareFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousResuscitationSepsis

Identifiers

PMID31539341
PMCPMC6754194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.