Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538949›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2019

Understanding the Use and Perceived Impact of a Medical Podcast: Qualitative Study.

Sarah L Malecki, Kieran L Quinn, Nathan Zilbert, Fahad Razak, Shiphra Ginsburg, Amol A Verma, Lindsay Melvin

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04933708 (The Effect of a Labor Podcast Intervention on Patient Satisfaction and Postpartum Depression in Nulliparous Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04933708 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Labor Podcast Intervention on Patient Satisfaction and Postpartum Depression in Nulliparous Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled201ConditionsLabor Onset and Length Abnormalities, Pregnancy RelatedArmsLabor Podcast
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Framework for a radiography student podcast.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. A wellbeing podcast for diagnostic radiography students.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L MaleckiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-0696
Kieran L QuinnDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1681-5170
Nathan ZilbertDivision of General Surgery, Trillium Health Partners, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-9376
Fahad RazakDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-7286
Shiphra GinsburgDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-6650
Amol A VermaDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-931X
Lindsay MelvinDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9709-2567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough podcasts are increasingly being produced for medical education, their use and perceived impact in informal educational settings are understudied.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore how and why physicians and medical learners listen to The Rounds Table (TRT), a medical podcast, as well as to determine the podcast's perceived impact on learning and practice.

methodsWeb-based podcast analytics were used to collect TRT usage statistics. A total of 17 medical TRT listeners were then identified and interviewed through purposive and convenience sampling, using a semistructured guide and a thematic analysis, until theoretical sufficiency was achieved.

resultsThe following four themes related to podcast listenership were identified: (1) participants thought that TRT increased efficiency, allowing them to multitask, predominantly using mobile listening platforms; (2) participants listened to the podcast for both education and entertainment, or "edutainment"; (3) participants thought that the podcast helped them keep up to date with medical literature; and (4) participants considered TRT to have an indirect effect on learning and clinical practice by increasing overall knowledge.

conclusionsOur results highlight how a medical podcast, designed for continuing professional development, is often used informally to promote learning. These findings enhance our understanding of how and why listeners engage with a medical podcast, which may be used to inform the development and evaluation of other podcasts.

Indexed as

grounded theorymedical educationpodcasts

Identifiers

PMID31538949
PMCPMC6754688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.