Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538723›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2020

Authentic engagement: A conceptual model for welcoming diverse and challenging consumer and survivor views in mental health research, policy, and practice.

Indigo Daya, Bridget Hamilton, Cath Roper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. How Do Participatory Citizenship Models Inform Co-production in Health Research? A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ensuring compulsory treatment is used as a last resort: a narrative review of the knowledge about Community Treatment Orders.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards Coproduction in Mental Health Academia: A Cooperative Inquiry.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The League: A person-centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Indigo DayaMelbourne Social Equity Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-0605
Bridget HamiltonCentre for Psychiatric Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cath RoperCentre for Psychiatric Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

HHSMelbourne Social Equity Institute at the University of MelbourneVictorian Mental Illness Awareness Council (VMIAC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As involvement of consumers/survivors in planning, delivery, and evaluation of services has increased, expectations of authentic and effective engagement, versus tokenism, have also risen. Different factors contribute to, or detract from, authentic engagement. Writing from mental health consumer/survivor and nursing positioning, respectively, we aim to redress the common problem of including only a narrow range of views and voices. This paper introduces a conceptual model that supports leaders in research, clinical, service, and policy roles to understand the necessity of engaging with a broader spectrum of consumer/survivor views and voices. The model draws on published consumer/survivor materials, making explicit diverse experiences of treatment and care and identifying the subsequent rich consumer/survivor advocacy agendas. We propose that strong co-production is made possible by recognizing and welcoming consumer/survivor activist, facilitator, transformer, and humanizer contributions. The conceptual model forms the basis for a proposed qualitative validation project.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMental Health ServicesBiomedical ResearchHumansMental DisordersModels, TheoreticalPatient ParticipationPolicy MakingPsychiatric NursingSurvivorsconsumer advocacyco-productionhealth policymental health servicespatient participationservice users

Identifiers

PMID31538723
PMCPMC7328715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.