Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538568›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2019

Promoting Cancer Screening in Partnership With Health Ministries in 9 African American Churches in South Los Angeles: An Implementation Pilot Study.

Annette E Maxwell, Aziza Lucas-Wright, Rhonda E Santifer, Claudia Vargas, Juana Gatson, L Cindy Chang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05174286 (Community Health Workers United to Reduce Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Among People at Higher Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05174286 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Community Health Workers United to Reduce Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Among People at Higher Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled880ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsSBIRT, Referral as Usual (RAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing Community Understanding of Cancer Clinical Trials Through Peer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Revisiting Alma Ata: A Blueprint for Cancer Care.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annette E MaxwellCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Aziza Lucas-WrightDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California.
Rhonda E SantiferDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California.
Claudia VargasDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California.
Juana GatsonDivision of Cancer Research and Training, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California.
L Cindy ChangCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

Supporting African American Churches to Promote Cancer ScreeningU54CA143931 · NCI · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI VADGAMA, JAYDUTT V. · 2009 to 2022
$19.7M
Training and Mentoring ProgramsU54CA143930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PIETRAS, RICHARD JOSEPH · 2009 to 2020
$7.5M
INCREASING DIVERSITY IN CANCER CONTROL RESEARCHR25CA078583 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAGAWA-SINGER, MARJORIE LOUISE, PASICK, RENA JOY · 1998 to 2017
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA078583NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143930NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE AND

objectivesWe conducted a pilot study to assess the degree to which an intervention led by community health advisors (CHAs) to promote cancer screening was delivered as intended and to estimate the potential effect of the intervention on receipt of screening. In contrast to previous studies and to maximize its potential public health impact, the intervention targeted 4 screening tests and only participants who were not up to date with screening guidelines for at least 1 cancer. Because CHAs had to both determine baseline adherence and provide counseling on 4 screening tests, the protocol was complex. Complex protocols can reduce implementation fidelity. INTERVENTION APPROACH: In partnership with health ministries at 9 African American churches in South Los Angeles, we conducted a 1-group pretest-posttest pilot study to assess the feasibility of implementing the intervention. CHAs recruited and obtained consent from church members aged 50 to 75 years; assessed adherence to national screening guidelines for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer; and provided evidence-based strategies (one-on-one counseling, print materials, reminder calls) to encourage screening for tests that were overdue. EVALUATION

methodsWe assessed implementation fidelity by reviewing baseline screening assessments and counseling scripts completed by CHAs. We estimated potential effect of the intervention on receipt of screening by using data from 3-month follow-up surveys, conducted by the research team, of participants who were nonadherent at baseline.

resultsFrom June 2016 to June 2018, 44 CHAs conducted baseline assessments of 775 participants, of whom 338 (44%) were nonadherent to national guidelines for 1 or more cancer screening tests. CHAs provided counseling to most nonadherent participants. At follow-up, about one-third of participants reported that they had discussed cancer screening with their provider and a smaller proportion reported receipt of a screening test; 13% of men and 25% of women reported receipt of colorectal cancer screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: This study demonstrates that with training and ongoing technical assistance, CHAs at African American health ministries can implement complex research protocols with good fidelity.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEarly Detection of CancerCommunity Health WorkersHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansLos AngelesNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID31538568
PMCPMC6795066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.