Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538540›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics

Battle of epigenetic proportions: comparing Illumina's EPIC methylation microarrays and TruSeq targeted bisulfite sequencing.

Jonathan A Heiss, Kasey J Brennan, Andrea A Baccarelli, Martha M Téllez-Rojo, Guadalupe Estrada-Gutiérrez, Robert O Wright, Allan C Just

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA Methylation in Alzheimer's Disease.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan A HeissDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-2509
Kasey J BrennanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrea A BaccarelliDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Martha M Téllez-RojoCenter for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Guadalupe Estrada-GutiérrezNational Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9551-9021
Robert O WrightDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Allan C JustDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-5957

Funding

The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Manish Arora · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Stress, Lead, Iron Deficiency and NeurodevelopmentR01ES013744 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Robert O Wright · 2007 to 2026
$13.4M
BPA, Phthalates & Stress: Mechanisms and Interactions for Childhood ObesityR01ES021357 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Environment, Fetal Tissue DNA Methylation & BirthweightR01ES020268 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BACCARELLI, ANDREA, WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2011 to 2013
$2.5M
The Programming Research in Obesity, GRowth, Environment and Social Stress (PROGRESS) CohortR24ES028522 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Megan K Horton, Maria Jose Rosa · 2017 to 2026
$1.8M
Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine Disrupters, DNA Methylation, and Childhood ObesityR00ES023450 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI JUST, ALLAN C. · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES023450NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013744NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020268NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021357NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES028522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation microarrays have been the platform of choice for epigenome-wide association studies in epidemiology, but declining costs have rendered targeted bisulphite sequencing a feasible alternative. Nonetheless, the literature for researchers seeking guidance on which platform to choose is sparse. To fill this gap, we conducted a comparison study in which we processed cord blood samples from four newborns in duplicates using both the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadChip and the Illumina TruSeq Methyl Capture EPIC Kit, and evaluated both platforms in regard to coverage, reproducibility, and identification of differential methylation. We conclude that with current analytic goals microarrays still outperform bisulphite sequencing for precise quantification of DNA methylation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultCohort StudiesEpigenomeEpigenomicsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInfant, NewbornSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAbisulphite sequencingcomparison of experimental platformsDNA methylationEWASmicroarray

Identifiers

PMID31538540
PMCPMC6961683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.