SynthesisTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents for the treatment of bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Adult Bronchiectasis: Consensus-Based Guidelines of the German Respiratory Society.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Guideline
- Metrics of Antifungal Effects of Ciprofloxacin onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Liposomal drug delivery to manage nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and other chronic lung infections.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Impact ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis is controversial. The objective of the study was to review systematically the efficacy of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in patients with bronchiectasis.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating inhaled ciprofloxacin agents among patients with bronchiectasis. Data were pooled using a meta-analysis technique.
resultsTwo phase II and four phase III RCTs were included with a total of 1685 patients. Treatment durations of phase III studies were 48 weeks, while those of phase II studies were shorter. Pooled analysis of overall studies exhibited a statistically significant benefit of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents in three exacerbation outcome measures, including time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.86,
conclusionsA meta-analysis of RCTs of inhaled ciprofloxacin agents showed clinical benefit in terms of pulmonary exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis. Since a significant increase of resistance was also noticed, clinical trials with a longer study period are required for a conclusive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.