Observational studyThe British journal of radiology2019
Incidence of internal mammary node in locally advanced breast cancer and its correlation with metastatic disease: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental dose distribution to contralateral internal mammary nodes in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Internal mammary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on anatomical imaging and functional imaging.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine incidence of internal mammary nodes (IMN) at baseline CT of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and ascertain prognostic implication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of all LABC patients from 1 January 2012 through 31 December 2014 was performed after approval from institutional review board. CTs of 182 patients enrolled were reviewed by two radiologists independently, and IMNs were documented based on size, location and relation with location of breast primary. 3-year follow-up was analysed and incidence of metastases was calculated as overall incidence, incidence in patients with and without discernible IMN at baseline imaging. Results are presented as numbers and percentages. Differences in metastases of two groups were compared using χ
results77 of 182 had identifiable IMN (42.3% incidence). Majority of identifiable nodes were on ipsilateral side of primary (incidence 90.90%) with higher incidence in patients with upper-outer quadrant tumours (55.9%). Majority were seen in second intercostal space (44.4%). 36 (19.7%) developed distant metastases within 3 years of therapy. Of these, 21 (27.3%) had IMN as compared with 15 (14.3 %) without IMN on baseline imaging. Patients with identifiable IMN on baseline CT had significantly higher incidence of distant metastases (
conclusionSignificant number LABC patients have identifiable IMN on baseline imaging with patients showing IMN on baseline CT showing significantly higher rate of metastatic disease following therapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Many LABC patients have identifiable IMNs on baseline imaging which show higher incidence of subsequent metastatic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.