SynthesisPaediatric anaesthesia2019
Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melatonin or its analogs as premedication to prevent emergence agitation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2019Pooled it
- Oral preanesthetic medication in children ... comparison between midazolam alone and in combination with ketamine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Pooled it
- Combined sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: determination of median effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Effect of Alleviating Preoperative Anxiety on Gastrointestinal Function Recovery After Laparoscopic High Ligation of the Hernia Sac in Children with Indirect Inguinal Hernia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- Added Syrup as a Flavoring to Oral Midazolam Intravenous Solution Premedication Improves Tolerability in Pediatric Patients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Trial
- Comparison between oral midazolam versus oral ketamine plus midazolam as preanesthetic medication in autism spectrum disorder: double-blind randomized clinical trial.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Trial
- Review of paediatric pharmacological and non-pharmacological procedural comfort strategies.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Review
- Premedication of Pediatric Cardiac Population with Midazolam: Comparison of Oral and Sublingual Administration Regarding Plasma Midazolam Concentration, Clinical Effectiveness, Hemodynamic and Behavioral Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Midazolam premedication: shaping pediatric perioperative outcomes.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of the sedative efficacy of oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg vs. 0.75 mg/kg) with papoose board restraint for managing severe dental anxiety in paediatric patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of optimal dosage combinations of oral midazolam and esketamine for pediatric preoperative sedation: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Prediction of anxiety in children aged 7-12 during preoperative anaesthesia evaluation - a prospective observational study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Immunomodulatory effects of nerve stimulator-guided brachial plexus block with laryngeal mask general anesthesia in pediatric upper limb surgery.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Oral Midazolam for Sedation and Amnesia in Preschool Children with Dental Anxiety: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Sedation Methods in Paediatric Auditory Electrophysiologic Testing: A Narrative Review.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric dental sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Review
- Median effective dosage of midazolam oral solution for preschool children in preoperative sedation.Ibrain · 2025Article
- A Comparative Evaluation of Midazolam, Ketamine and Their Combination as Sedative Agents in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in dentistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most widely used options for minimal/moderate sedation in pediatric patients is oral midazolam, as it presents an alternative to less well-accepted routes of administration (eg, intravenous or intranasal) of this well-known efficacious and well-tolerated short-acting benzodiazepine. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to identify clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric patients in the context of premedication before anesthesia or during diagnostic/treatment procedures. The percentage of responders (response rate) after single administration of oral midazolam was evaluated and compared versus placebo in a subset of placebo-controlled studies. The range of oral midazolam doses providing effective sedation in the different pediatric age subsets was analyzed in order to assess optimum dosing strategies. A total of 25 pediatric clinical studies, utilizing a variety of measures of sedation effectiveness, were selected. These studies included a total of 1472 patients (aged 4 months-18 years) treated with midazolam (0.25-1.5 mg/kg) and 138 patients treated with placebo. The response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranged from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%], while with placebo response rates ranged from 4.0% [0.6%, 23.5%] to 41.0% [29.4%, 53.6%]. When considering the 4 placebo-controlled studies, the odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for the comparison of midazolam vs. placebo ranged from 13.4 [5.0, 36.0] to 25.9 [6.7, 100.6]. The analysis of subgroups by context of sedation showed response rates [95% confidence interval] with oral midazolam ranging from 36.7% [21.6%, 54.9%] to 97.0% [94.8%, 98.3%] for anesthetic premedication and from 56.1% [43.1%, 68.4] to 97.8% [86.1%, 99.7%] for medical procedures. The efficacy of midazolam for pediatric minimal/moderate sedation from a dose of 0.25 mg/kg and above was demonstrated. The probability of occurrence of adverse events and over-sedation increases with increasing doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.