Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538265›Full record

SynthesisCell and tissue banking2019

Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review.

Meng-Jiun Penny Lin, Tanisha Jowsey, Maurice A Curtis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cell and tissue banking, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Race and Ethnicity in Lewy Body Dementia: A Narrative Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meng-Jiun Penny LinSchool of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. penny.lin@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-755X
Tanisha JowseyFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-9225
Maurice A CurtisAnatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-0233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of brain tissue for research purposes is an important endeavour in research on ageing, pathological diagnosis, and the advancement of treatment of neurological or neurodegenerative diseases. While some tissue samples can be obtained from a living patient, the procurement of a whole brain requires the donation from people after their death. In order to promote positive attitudes towards brain donation, it is essential to understand why people do or do not donate their brain to medical research. In 2018 we undertook a systematic review of the international literature concerning people's attitudes, motivations, and feelings about brain donation. Five electronic databases were searched: Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar. Search terms included: ("brain donor*" OR "brain donation" OR "brain banking" OR "banking on brain") AND (attitude* OR motivation* OR decision*") AND (LIMIT-TO "human") AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "English")). Articles were analysed using the Framework for Assessing Qualitative Evaluations and a meta-ethnographic approach. Fourteen articles were included for review. The findings suggest four universal factors informing a person's decision to donate their brain: (1) contextual knowledge, (2) conceptual understandings, (3) family/friends matter, and (4) personal experience, time and process. The findings also indicate that the way healthcare professionals present themselves can influence people's feelings and attitudes towards brain donation. Healthcare and research professionals who are involved in brain donation processes must be mindful of the complex and multiple factors that influence donation outcomes. Effective and sensitive communication with potential donors and their family/friends is paramount.

Indexed as

BrainTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAttitudeBiomedical ResearchDecision MakingEmotionsHumansMotivationAttitudesBarriersBrain donationDonorFramework for Assessing Qualitative Evaluations (FAQE)Meta-ethnographyMotivationsReview

Identifiers

PMID31538265
PMCPMC6863784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.