ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Automated 4-dimensional regional myocardial strain evaluation using cardiac computed tomography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Computed Tomography: Technological Developments and Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Functional myocardial assessment in cine cardiac computerized tomographic angiography using echocardiographic feature-tracking software in patients with and without significant coronary disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Quantifying left ventricular myocardial strain in patients with different CAD-RADS levels based on computed tomography feature tracking technology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Myocardial Regional Shortening from 4D Cardiac CT Angiography for the Detection of Left Ventricular Segmental Wall Motion Abnormality.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure Estimated Using the SHSES Scale, and Feature Tracking Computed Tomography-Derived Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Hypertensive Patients.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2022Article
- Regional left ventricular endocardial strains estimated from low-dose 4DCT: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Novel Cardiac Computed Tomography Methods for the Assessment of Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Feasibility of CT-derived myocardial strain measurement in patients with advanced cardiac valve disease.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Functional cardiac CT-Going beyond Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease with Cine CT, CT-FFR, CT Perfusion and Machine Learning.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of myocardial regional function is generally performed by visual "eyeballing" which is highly subjective. A robust quantifiable parameter of regional function is required to provide an objective, repeatable and comparable measure of myocardial performance. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of novel regional myocardial strain software from cardiac computed tomography (CT) datasets. 93 consecutive patients who had undergone retrospectively gated cardiac CT were evaluated by the software, which utilizes a finite element based tracking algorithm through the cardiac cycle. Circumferential (CS), longitudinal (LS) and radial (RS) strains were calculated for each of 16 myocardial segments and compared to a visual assessment, carried out by an experienced cardiologist on cine movies of standard "echo" views derived from the CT data. A subset of 37 cases was compared to speckle strain by echocardiography. The automated software performed successfully in 93/106 cases, with minimal human interaction. Peak CS, LS and RS all differentiated well between normal, hypokinetic and akinetic segments. Peak strains for akinetic segments were generally post-systolic, peaking at 50 ± 17% of the RR interval compared to 43 ± 9% for normokinetic segments. Using ROC analysis to test the ability to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments, the area under the curve was 0.84 ± 0.01 for CS, 0.80 ± 0.02 for RS and 0.68 ± 0.02 for LS. There was a moderate agreement with speckle strain. Automated 4D regional strain analysis of CT datasets shows a good correspondence to visual analysis and successfully differentiates between normal and abnormal segments, thus providing an objective quantifiable map of myocardial regional function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.