Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538258›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Automated 4-dimensional regional myocardial strain evaluation using cardiac computed tomography.

Zvi Peled, Yechiel Lamash, Shemy Carasso, Anath Fischer, Yoram Agmon, Diab Mutlak, Doron Aronson, Gil Bolotin, Jonathan Lessick

Abstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardiac Computed Tomography: Technological Developments and Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zvi PeledDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Yechiel LamashFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Shemy CarassoDepartment of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Anath FischerFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Yoram AgmonDepartment of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Diab MutlakDepartment of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Doron AronsonDepartment of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Gil BolotinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Jonathan LessickDepartment of Cardiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haaliya Street, 31096, Haifa, Israel. j_lessick@rambam.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4430-712X
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILRambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of myocardial regional function is generally performed by visual "eyeballing" which is highly subjective. A robust quantifiable parameter of regional function is required to provide an objective, repeatable and comparable measure of myocardial performance. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of novel regional myocardial strain software from cardiac computed tomography (CT) datasets. 93 consecutive patients who had undergone retrospectively gated cardiac CT were evaluated by the software, which utilizes a finite element based tracking algorithm through the cardiac cycle. Circumferential (CS), longitudinal (LS) and radial (RS) strains were calculated for each of 16 myocardial segments and compared to a visual assessment, carried out by an experienced cardiologist on cine movies of standard "echo" views derived from the CT data. A subset of 37 cases was compared to speckle strain by echocardiography. The automated software performed successfully in 93/106 cases, with minimal human interaction. Peak CS, LS and RS all differentiated well between normal, hypokinetic and akinetic segments. Peak strains for akinetic segments were generally post-systolic, peaking at 50 ± 17% of the RR interval compared to 43 ± 9% for normokinetic segments. Using ROC analysis to test the ability to differentiate between normal and abnormal segments, the area under the curve was 0.84 ± 0.01 for CS, 0.80 ± 0.02 for RS and 0.68 ± 0.02 for LS. There was a moderate agreement with speckle strain. Automated 4D regional strain analysis of CT datasets shows a good correspondence to visual analysis and successfully differentiates between normal and abnormal segments, thus providing an objective quantifiable map of myocardial regional function.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMyocardial ContractionSoftwareVentricular Function, LeftAgedAutomationEchocardiographyFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsCardiac computed tomographyDeformation imagingRegional myocardial functionSystolic function

Identifiers

PMID31538258
OpenAlexW2974687702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.