ArticleWorld journal of urology2020
Management of low-risk prostate cancer in patients with enlarged glands and lower urinary tract symptoms: robotic total prostatectomy, a novel technique.
Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic surgery in healthcare: current challenges, technological advances, and global implementation prospects.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Navigating the evolving diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of complete intrafascial prostatectomy in suspected prostate cancer patients with dysuria: a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Robotic surgery in urology: the way forward.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLow-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is primarily managed with Active Surveillance (AS). A subset of these patients have significantly enlarged glands and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) recalcitrant to medical therapy. Radical treatment in this patient population risks compromise to both erectile function and continence. Therefore, our primary aim is to introduce a novel surgical technique, robotic total prostatectomy (RTP), for the management of severely enlarged prostate hyperplasia with concomitant suspicion of low-risk prostate cancer.
methodsAfter IRB approval and patient consultation/education, we performed RTP on 12 consecutive patients who presented with low-risk PCa and significantly enlarged prostate glands with LUTS. Inclusion criteria included patients with suspicion of low-risk malignancy, subjective/objective complaint of LUTS, and pre-operative prostate size > 60 g. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables were studied in the following domains: surgical, oncologic, continence and erectile function.
resultsA total of 12 patients underwent RTP. Mean preoperative prostate volume and PSA was estimated at 96.96 g and 8.79, respectively. Surgical time, EBL and LOS was estimated at 180.8 min, 189.6 ml, and 2 days, respectively. Post-operative variables confirmed resolution of LUTS (mean PVR 41.78/IPSS 8.3) and efficient oncologic control (mean PSA 0.04), with minimal compromise of sexual function. 100% continence was achieved at 3 months.
conclusionRTP is a novel, efficient surgical procedure for the treatment of patients with at-risk for low-grade malignancy and symptomatic LUTS in an enlarged gland. Expanding the indication to patients with low-risk malignancy, irrespective of prostate size may alleviate the adverse effects of radical treatment in this select subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.