Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31538210›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2019

[Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Caroline Tscherpel, Christian Grefkes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives.Neurological research and practice · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline TscherpelKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Christian GrefkesKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. christian.grefkes@uk-koeln.de.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional recovery of stroke-related deficits is mainly achieved through neural reorganization. Neurorehabilitative approaches, therefore, aim at supporting positive processes while suppressing maladaptive neuronal processes. This review summarizes the main findings of studies using non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation with respect to the benefits of the treatment for motor deficits after stroke. In addition, the article discusses possible approaches to enhance the effectiveness of neuromodulatory approaches and thus improve the outcome of patients.

Indexed as

Motor DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionConnectivityFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeurorehabilitationTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31538210
OpenAlexW2974148516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.