ArticleScientific reports2019
Fruit fly identification, population dynamics and fruit damage during fruiting seasons of sweet oranges in Rusitu Valley, Zimbabwe.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population dynamics of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a semirural area under subtropical monsoon climate of Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2003, the pest species Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) was reported for the first time in Kenya, Africa, and subsequently on many other African countries. In this work, 20 locations along the Rusitu Valley (Zimbabwe) were sampled in 2014 during the sweet oranges fruiting seasons, to verify the fruit fly taxonomy, invasion source, population dynamics, and fruit damage. The trapped fruit flies were identified using morphological traits and molecular techniques, as B. dorsalis. The haplotype network analysis revealed that Zimbabwe COI sequences were identical to other African B. dorsalis sequences. Fruit fly trappings per day varied during the year, although it remained always high. The same applies to fruit damage, most likely due to the permanent availability of cultivated and wild fruit varieties during the year. Rusitu Valley was invaded by B. dorsalis, most likely from neighbouring countries. Ten years after the first report in Kenya, the complete or near complete invasion of Africa has been achieved by B. dorsalis. In northern Africa the distribution is clearly limited by the Sahara desert. The large population size, the polyphagous nature of the species, and the continuous availability of suitable host fruit species during the year complicates the eradication of this species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.