Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537862›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Goal-directed vs. habitual instrumental behavior during reward processing in anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study.

Julius Steding, Ilka Boehm, Joseph A King, Daniel Geisler, Franziska Ritschel, Maria Seidel, Arne Doose, Charlotte Jaite, Veit Roessner, Michael N Smolka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Avoidance habit learning in adolescents and young women with anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prefrontal contributions to the stability and variability of thought and conscious experience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julius StedingDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ilka BoehmDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Joseph A KingDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-5578
Daniel GeislerDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-5329
Franziska RitschelDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Maria SeidelDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Arne DooseDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Charlotte JaiteDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Veit RoessnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael N SmolkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-5569
Stefan EhrlichDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. transden.lab@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-4445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have proposed that altered reward processing and elevated cognitive control underlie the etiology of anorexia nervosa (AN). A newly debated notion suggests altered habit learning and an overreliance on habits may contribute to the persistence of AN. In weight-recovered AN patients, we previously found neuroimaging-based evidence for unaltered reward processing, but elevated cognitive control. In order to differentiate between state versus trait factors, we here contrast the aforementioned hypotheses in a sample of acutely underweight AN (acAN) patients. 37 acAN patients and 37 closely matched healthy controls (HC) underwent a functional MRI while performing an established instrumental motivation task. We found no group differences with respect to neural responses during the anticipation or receipt of reward. However, the behavioral response data showed a bimodal distribution, indicative for a goal-directed (gAN) and a habit-driven (hAN) patient subgroup. Additional analyses revealed decreased mOFC activation during reward anticipation in hAN, which would be in line with a habit-driven response. These findings provide a new perspective on the debate regarding the notion of increased goal-directed versus habitual behavior in AN. If replicable, the observed dissociation between gAN and hAN might help to tailor therapeutic approaches to individual patient characteristics.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnorexia NervosaBrain MappingChildCognitionFemaleGoalsHabitsHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31537862
PMCPMC6753148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.