Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537804›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2019

A qualitative investigation of the allergic rhinitis network from the perspective of the patient.

Biljana Cvetkovski, Vicky Kritikos, Rachel Tan, Kwok Yan, Elizabeth Azzi, Pamela Srour, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06027736 (The Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Educational Model in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis in a Malaysian Tertiary Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06027736 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Pharmacist-led Educational Model in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis in a Malaysian Tertiary Hospital: A Randomised Control Trial Protocol (AR-PRISE RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Chee Ping ChongRan2023 to 2024Enrolled154ConditionsAllergic Rhinitis, Pharmaceutical Care, Pharmaceutical ServicesArmspharmacist-led education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient perspectives of allergic rhinitis and allergen immunotherapy: A qualitative study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Biljana CvetkovskiQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. biljana.cvetkovski@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2297-8141
Vicky KritikosQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachel TanQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kwok YanRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth AzziQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pamela SrourQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sinthia Bosnic-AnticevichQuality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient self-selection of over-the-counter medicines for the management of allergic rhinitis is suboptimal. The mapping of the allergic rhinitis network demonstrates that patients' decisions with regards to their allergic rhinitis management can be influenced by up to 11 individuals/resources (alters). This study aimed to identify the role of alters within the allergic rhinitis network and identify the factors that determined their degree of influence as perceived by the patient. This research was a qualitative exploration embedded in an empirical framework and social network theory. People with allergic rhinitis were interviewed about their network and transcripts were analysed deductively and inductively. Transcripts were coded by researchers independently and then discussed until agreement was reached. Forty-one participants described the roles of 17 alters on their allergic rhinitis management. The roles of alters fell within five categories: diagnosis, medication prescription/supply/administration, medication recommendation, information about allergic rhinitis and emotional support. Participant interactions with these alters were often acute and had a long standing effect, with the participants often navigating the long-term management on their own. The significance of the influence of each alter on their allergic rhinitis management was dependent on the level of trust in their relationship, impact of the role made to the participants' day-to-day management of allergic rhinitis and/or the participant's beliefs. Allergic rhinitis management was fragmented and had opportunity to be improved by developing strategies, resources and policies to support self-management in collaboration with patients and health-care professionals.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRhinitis, AllergicSelf-ManagementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31537804
PMCPMC6753105
OpenAlexW2973543245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.