Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537622›Full record

ArticleGenetics2019

Extending Tests of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium to Structured Populations.

Wei Hao, John D Storey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei HaoLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544.
John D StoreyLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544 jstorey@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5992-402X

Funding

Quantitavie and Computational Biology Graduate ProgramT32HG003284 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua Michael Akey, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman · 2004 to 2026
$9.9M
Models and Methods for Population GenomicsR01HG006448 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI STOREY, JOHN D · 2012 to 2025
$3.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006448NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG003284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is an important component in almost all analyses of population genetic data. Genetic markers that violate HWE are often treated as special cases; for example, they may be flagged as possible genotyping errors, or they may be investigated more closely for evolutionary signatures of interest. The presence of population structure is one reason why genetic markers may fail a test of HWE. This is problematic because almost all natural populations studied in the modern setting show some degree of structure. Therefore, it is important to be able to detect deviations from HWE for reasons other than structure. To this end, we extend statistical tests of HWE to allow for population structure, which we call a test of "structural HWE." Additionally, our new test allows one to automatically choose tuning parameters and identify accurate models of structure. We demonstrate our approach on several important studies, provide theoretical justification for the test, and present empirical evidence for its utility. We anticipate the proposed test will be useful in a broad range of analyses of genome-wide population genetic data.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenotyping TechniquesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPopulationReference StandardsGenetic MarkersadmixedadmixtureChi-square testHWEpopulation geneticsquality controlrandom matingsignificance test

Identifiers

PMID31537622
PMCPMC6827367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.