Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537576›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Accuracy of endoscopic staging and targeted biopsies for routine gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy evaluation study protocol of a prospective, cohort study: the estimate study.

Stella A V Nieuwenburg, William W Waddingham, David Graham, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Katharina Biermann, Ernst J Kuipers, Matthew Banks, Marnix Jansen, Manon C W Spaander

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stella A V NieuwenburgGastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-1814
William W WaddinghamEndoscopy, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
David GrahamEndoscopy, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Manuel Rodriguez-JustoPathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Katharina BiermannPathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ernst J KuipersGastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew BanksEndoscopy, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Marnix JansenEndoscopy, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Manon C W SpaanderGastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands v.spaander@erasmusmc.nl.
University College Hospital · GBErasmus MC · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S022244/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) are at risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma. Their diagnosis and management currently rely on histopathological guidance after random endoscopic biopsy sampling (Sydney biopsy strategy). This approach has significant flaws such as under-diagnosis, poor reproducibility and poor correlation between endoscopy and histology. This prospective, international multicentre study aims to establish whether endoscopy-led risk stratification accurately and reproducibly predicts CAG and IM extent and disease stage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with CAG and/or IM on standard white light endoscopy (WLE) will be prospectively identified and invited to undergo a second endoscopy performed by an expert endoscopist using enhanced endoscopic imaging techniques with virtual chromoendoscopy. Extent of CAG/IM will be endoscopically staged with enhanced imaging and compared with standard WLE. Histopathological risk stratification through targeted biopsies will be compared with endoscopic disease staging and to random biopsy staging on WLE as a reference. At least 234 patients are required to show a 10 % difference in sensitivity and accuracy between enhanced imaging endoscopy-led staging and the current biopsy-led staging protocol of gastric atrophy with a power (beta) of 80 % and a 0.05 probability of a type I error (alpha). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the respective Institutional Review Boards (Netherlands: MEC-2018-078; UK: 19/LO/0089). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7661; Pre-results.

Indexed as

BiopsyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastric MucosaGastritis, AtrophicGastrointestinal NeoplasmsImage EnhancementFemaleHumansMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPreventive Health ServicesProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentendoscopygastrointestinal tumourspreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID31537576
PMCPMC6756576
OpenAlexW2973639235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.