Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537552›Full record

GuidelineArchives of disease in childhood2019

Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach.

Thomas Salaets, Mark A Turner, Mary Short, Robert M Ward, Isamu Hokuto, Ronald L Ariagno, Agnes Klein, Sandra Beauman, Kelly Wade, Merran Thomson and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Archives of disease in childhood, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06889376 (The Use of Intranasal Sedation With Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06889376 phase1not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Intranasal Sedation With Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolish Mother Memorial Hospital Research InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDrug SafetyArmsIntranasal midazolam administration via the DART™ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Adverse Drug Reactions in Neonates: How to Detect and Address Signals in the Noise.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Pediatric Research Imperative: Addressing Neonates in Drug Development Through Understanding Neonatal Clinical Pharmacology.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Thomas SalaetsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mark A TurnerInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-8656
Mary ShortEli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Robert M Ward4Department of Pediatrics, Divisions of Neonatology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Isamu HokutoDepartment of Pediatrics, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan.
Ronald L AriagnoDepartment Pediatrics-Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Agnes KleinHealth Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra BeaumanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Kelly WadeDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Merran ThomsonHillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK.
Eve RobertsInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Judy HarrisonMaintenance and Support Services Organization, MedDRA, McLean, Virginia, USA.
Theresa QuinnEnterprise Vocabulary Services, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Gerri BaerOffice of Pediatric Therapeutics, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jonathan DavisFloating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium karel.allegaert@uz.kuleuven.ac.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-5105
International Neonatal Consortium
University of Liverpool · GBChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USEli Lilly (United States) · USErasmus MC · NLHealth Canada · CAHillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKU Leuven · BENational Cancer Institute · USStanford University · USSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTufts Medical Center · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Critical Path to Public Private PartnershipsU18FD005320 · FDA · CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE · PI Klaus Romero · 2014 to 2026
$127.1M
FDA HHS U18 FD005320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of the seriousness, expectedness and causality are necessary for any adverse event (AE) in a clinical trial. In addition, assessing AE severity helps determine the importance of the AE in the clinical setting. Standardisation of AE severity criteria could make safety information more reliable and comparable across trials. Although standardised AE severity scales have been developed in other research fields, they are not suitable for use in neonates. The development of an AE severity scale to facilitate the conduct and interpretation of neonatal clinical trials is therefore urgently needed.

methodsA stepwise consensus process was undertaken within the International Neonatal Consortium (INC) with input from all relevant stakeholders. The consensus process included several rounds of surveys (based on a Delphi approach), face-to-face meetings and a pilot validation.

resultsNeonatal AE severity was classified by five grades (mild, moderate, severe, life threatening or death). AE severity in neonates was defined by the effect of the AE on age appropriate behaviour, basal physiological functions and care changes in response to the AE. Pilot validation of the generic criteria revealed κ=0.23 and guided further refinement. This generic scale was applied to 35 typical and common neonatal AEs resulting in the INC neonatal AE severity scale (NAESS) V.1.0, which is now publicly available. DISCUSSION: The INC NAESS is an ongoing effort that will be continuously updated. Future perspectives include further validation and the development of a training module for users.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexClinical Trials as TopicConsensusDelphi TechniqueEndpoint DeterminationHumansInfant, Newbornadverse eventdrug safetyneonateseverity grading

Identifiers

PMID31537552
PMCPMC6943241
OpenAlexW2973923778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.