Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31537325›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2020

Trauma video review utilization: A survey of practice in the United States.

R P Dumas, M A Vella, J S Hatchimonji, L Ma, Z Maher, D N Holena

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced Trauma Video Review With Computer Vision: Trauma Resuscitation Phase Segmentation and Procedure Detection.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Trauma video review: how long do we curb our enthusiasm?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of validity and reliability of video analysis and live observations to assess trauma team performance.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Observational
  10. Introducing the Safety Threats and Adverse events in Trauma (STAT) taxonomy: standardized classification system for evaluating safety during trauma resuscitation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R P DumasDivision of General and Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: ryan.dumas@utsouthwestern.edu.
M A VellaDivision of Acute Care Surgery and Trauma, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester NY, USA. Electronic address: michael_vella@urmc.rochester.edu.
J S HatchimonjiDivision of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Justin.Hatchimonji@uphs.upenn.edu.
L MaDivision of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: lucywma@sas.upenn.edu.
Z MaherDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: zoe.maher@tuhs.temple.edu.
D N HolenaDivision of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: daniel.holena@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

Reducing mortality attributable to cardiac arrest after injury: leveraging audiovisual recording of resuscitations to identify modifiable procedural risk factors for mortalityR03HL141521 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HOLENA, DANIEL NORMAN · 2018 to 2019
$161k
NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL141521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrauma video review (TVR) for quality improvement and education in the United States has been described for nearly three decades. The most recent information on this practice indicated a declining prevalence. We hypothesized that TVR utilization has increased since most recent estimates.

methodsWe conducted a survey of TVR practices at level I and level II US trauma centers. We distributed an electronic survey covering past, current, and future TVR utilization to the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma membership.

results45.0% of US level I and level II trauma centers completed surveys. 71/249 centers (28.5%) had active TVR programs. The use of TVR did not differ between level I and level II centers (28.8% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.87). Respondents using TVR were overwhelmingly positive about its perception (median score 8, [IQR 6-9]; 10 = 'best') at their institutions.

conclusionsTVR use at Level I centers has increased over the past decade. Increased TVR utilization may form the basis for multicenter studies comparing processes of care during trauma resuscitation.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Health Care SurveysHumansProcedures and Techniques UtilizationSurgical Procedures, OperativeTrauma CentersUnited StatesVideo RecordingWounds and InjuriesEducationMedicolegalQuality improvementTrauma video review

Identifiers

PMID31537325
PMCPMC8428979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.